UberTechnoid(a)home.com wrote:
Get an Atari drive instead. The interface of the C=
drives is probably
just as well documented, but the drives were BUTT SLOW. The Atari drives
were factors faster.
Commodore 1541 type drive are serial and have a tremendous
amount of handshaking to the interface. It's just a matter
of writting new interface routines. I've been able to transfer
one byte across the interface in about 50 clock cycles (loading
a 50K file in 12 to 13 seconds).
UberTechnoid(a)home.com wrote:
I thought they used a 6507 or 6510 processor...
The C64 uses a 6510 which is a 6502 with a built in 6 bit
I/O port and DMA. The 1541 uses a 6502.
UberTechnoid(a)home.com wrote:
Other machines that used 'smart' floppy drives
might be the Adam and
Aquarius. I never saw a drive for the Aquarius, but there was supposed to
be one. The COCO and Ti99 had parallel buss drive interfaces as did the
Apple (sorta).
I had a Aquarius disk drive at one time. It used those tiny diskettes
that are smaller than the Compact floppies used on the Amstrad. I traded
the Aquarius drive to someone in Australia that had a pile of Aquarius
disks and no drive. I traded for a stack of Aquarius docs and a board
that allows me to use 1541s with my Aquarius.
Regards,
--Doug
=========================================
Doug Coward
@ home in Poulsbo, WA
Analog Computer Online Museum and History Center
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog
=========================================