10 Mar
2014
10 Mar
'14
8:29 p.m.
This is just a little test so that the infamous PCjr can serve (most) of
its own web site:
http://67.185.176.54:8080/
That link has the main page, and it should look like my normal PCjr web
site. This next link has some fun server status like memory available,
DOS version, BIOS date, etc.:
http://67.185.176.54:8080/proc/
You might find the TCP/IP statistics interesting. It's been running
over 24 hours now.
There are one or two links that are broken because I did not get all of
the content moved over. Otherwise, it should work if you try it. The
speed might not be great as it is a 4.77Mhz machine and multiple people
can make requests at the same time, so be patient - it will catch up.
Please, no saturation bombing - it is very easy to DoS this particular
DOS machine.
-Mike
11 Mar
11 Mar
5:55 a.m.
On 11 March 2014 03:29, Michael B. Brutman <mbbrutman-cctalk at brutman.com> wrote:
This is just a little test so that the infamous PCjr
can serve (most) of its
own web site:
http://67.185.176.54:8080/
That link has the main page, and it should look like my normal PCjr web
site. This next link has some fun server status like memory available, DOS
version, BIOS date, etc.:
http://67.185.176.54:8080/proc/
You might find the TCP/IP statistics interesting. It's been running over 24
hours now.
There are one or two links that are broken because I did not get all of the
content moved over. Otherwise, it should work if you try it. The speed might
not be great as it is a 4.77Mhz machine and multiple people can make
requests at the same time, so be patient - it will catch up. Please, no
saturation bombing - it is very easy to DoS this particular DOS machine.
Oh, very neat! Kudos for an MS-DOS webserver on an 8088!
I've tweeted it, but I wouldn't worry too much - I don't have that
many followers. When I tweet an eBay auction, it normally only gets
30-40 hits or so. I don't think that will DDOS it.
--
Liam Proven * Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk * GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com * Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 * Cell: +44 7939-087884
8:20 a.m.
On 3/11/2014 5:55 AM, Liam Proven wrote:
Oh, very neat! Kudos for an MS-DOS webserver on an
8088!
I've tweeted it, but I wouldn't worry too much - I don't have that
many followers. When I tweet an eBay auction, it normally only gets
30-40 hits or so. I don't think that will DDOS it.
Twitter followers are probably safe.
Slashdot did an article on the 30th anniversary of the PCjr, so I think
we are safe. Oh wait, Slashdot was famous for their dupes. ;-0
Current stats: Uptime 40+ hours, 3690 TCP sockets connected, 4375
objects served
Packets received: 65250, sent: 77884, retrans 450 (0.57%)
Mike
8:41 a.m.
hmm. you *could* move the port to 8088 of course. :-)
On 11-03-14 13:55, Liam Proven wrote:
On 11 March 2014 03:29, Michael B. Brutman
<mbbrutman-cctalk at brutman.com> wrote:
--
Met vriendelijke Groet,
Simon Claessen
drukknop.nl
This is just a little test so that the infamous
PCjr can serve (most) of its
own web site:
http://67.185.176.54:8080/
That link has the main page, and it should look like my normal PCjr web
site. This next link has some fun server status like memory available, DOS
version, BIOS date, etc.:
http://67.185.176.54:8080/proc/
You might find the TCP/IP statistics interesting. It's been running over 24
hours now.
There are one or two links that are broken because I did not get all of the
content moved over. Otherwise, it should work if you try it. The speed might
not be great as it is a 4.77Mhz machine and multiple people can make
requests at the same time, so be patient - it will catch up. Please, no
saturation bombing - it is very easy to DoS this particular DOS machine.
Oh, very neat! Kudos for an MS-DOS webserver on an 8088!
I've tweeted it, but I wouldn't worry too much - I don't have that
many followers. When I tweet an eBay auction, it normally only gets
30-40 hits or so. I don't think that will DDOS it.
10:03 a.m.
It loads fine for me here in New Zealand Mike.
Terry (Tez)
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Simon Claessen <simski at dds.nl> wrote:
hmm. you *could* move the port to 8088 of course. :-)
On 11-03-14 13:55, Liam Proven wrote:
On 11 March 2014 03:29, Michael B. Brutman
<mbbrutman-cctalk at brutman.com>
wrote:
--
Met vriendelijke Groet,
Simon Claessen
drukknop.nl
This is just a little test so that the infamous
PCjr can serve (most) of
its
own web site:
http://67.185.176.54:8080/
That link has the main page, and it should look like my normal PCjr web
site. This next link has some fun server status like memory available,
DOS
version, BIOS date, etc.:
http://67.185.176.54:8080/proc/
You might find the TCP/IP statistics interesting. It's been running
over 24
hours now.
There are one or two links that are broken because I did not get all of
the
content moved over. Otherwise, it should work if you try it. The speed
might
not be great as it is a 4.77Mhz machine and multiple people can make
requests at the same time, so be patient - it will catch up. Please, no
saturation bombing - it is very easy to DoS this particular DOS machine.
Oh, very neat! Kudos for an MS-DOS webserver on an 8088!
I've tweeted it, but I wouldn't worry too much - I don't have that
many followers. When I tweet an eBay auction, it normally only gets
30-40 hits or so. I don't think that will DDOS it.
7:20 p.m.
On 3/11/2014 8:41 AM, Simon Claessen wrote:
hmm. you *could* move the port to 8088 of course. :-)
I wish I was that clever - next time!
Current stats:
Uptime: 51:38
Total connections: 5668
Requests served: 6617
Packets sent: 122562
Packets received: 103766
Packets retransmitted: 832
Sequence or ACK errors: 815
Dropped (no space): 1
The dropped part is interesting; that means that something sent the
server data so fast (or so much of it) that the machine could not even
buffer the data fast enough, and some of the data got thrown away. It
would have been recovered when the other side retransmitted, but still
that's hard to do if the other side was just sending HTTP requests.
The logs will be interesting; I'll be able to see how many of the
connections were honest HTTP requests vs. bots or other things. I don't
have a full packet trace running, but there is enough in the logs to
make a meaningful analysis of the traffic.
The retransmit rate is running at 0.6% of transmitted packets, which is
very good overall. A packet can be lost anywhere along the way and I'm
sure that some of the paths take 15 to 25 hops easily.
-Mike
3900
days inactive
3900
days old
6 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
lproven＠gmail.com -
mbbrutman-cctalk＠brutman.com -
simski＠dds.nl -
terry＠webweavers.co.nz -
webmaster＠supervinx.com