22 Feb
2007
22 Feb
'07
8:25 p.m.
We were talking in the ccmp IRC channel and I thought I'd share this
hi-larious photo:
http://tinyurl.com/2884e4
Enjoy.
22 Feb
22 Feb
8:33 p.m.
OT + minority = stupid to post.
-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Wolfe [mailto:fireflyst at earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 8:25 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
Subject: Off-topic but still funny.
We were talking in the ccmp IRC channel and I thought I'd share this
hi-larious photo:
http://tinyurl.com/2884e4
Enjoy.
8:45 p.m.
_.~._
,~'.~(a)~.`~~.`~.
/ : _..._ : \
{ :,"''\\`".: }
`C) 9 _ 9 (--.._,-"""-.__
( )(@)( ) `.
`-.___.-' LOL \
,' \ / ,` EVANK ;`-._,-.
,' ,'/ ,' `---t.,-. \_
,--.,',' ,'----.__\ _( \----'
'///,`,--.,' `-.__.--' `. )
'///,' `-`
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Evan Koblentz
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 7:34 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
Subject: RE: Off-topic but still funny.
OT + minority = stupid to post.
-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Wolfe [mailto:fireflyst at earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 8:25 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
Subject: Off-topic but still funny.
We were talking in the ccmp IRC channel and I thought I'd
share this hi-larious photo:
http://tinyurl.com/2884e4
Enjoy.
10:42 p.m.
2nd that motion.......
[ My Corner of Cyberspace http://ragooman.home.comcast.net/ ]
Evan Koblentz wrote:
OT + minority = stupid to post.
23 Feb
23 Feb
9:43 a.m.
New subject: Off-topic but still *not* funny.
And thusly were the wise words spake by Julian Wolfe
We were talking in the ccmp IRC channel and I thought I'd share this
hi-larious photo:
http://tinyurl.com/2884e4
Enjoy.
**NOT**
Why is an old OT thread being reanimated?!
Cheers,
Bryan
3:30 p.m.
New subject: Off-topic but still *not* funny.
On 2/23/07, Bryan Pope <bpope at wordstock.com> wrote:
And thusly were the wise words spake by Julian Wolfe
How is that funny? What a waste of bandwidth...
We were talking in the ccmp IRC channel and I thought I'd share this
hi-larious photo:
http://tinyurl.com/2884e4
Enjoy.
**NOT**
Why is an old OT thread being reanimated?!
Cheers,
Bryan
8:52 p.m.
New subject: Off-topic but still *not* funny.
How is that funny? What a waste of bandwidth...
Ignoreing content, this was not a great wast of bandwidth.
The message that started this was only 120 bytes of text encased in a 3.7k email,
including headers, by the time
it got to me. From my viewpoint at least it had a tinyurl and not a 3 line url, and was
easily ignored.
Not including this minor rant, there have been no less than 5 messages about the OT
content of those 130
charettors totaling close to 19.5k of email.
To put this back on topic, these messages including headers representing more total
storage than was available
on my first two computers (the first one SDK80 only had 2k) and my second an EVK300 only
had 16k. What we
are talking about here is equal to about 1 second of a single stream of talk radio on my
audio server. Now if you
want to talk about a huge waste of bandwidth ....
So much in life needs to be ignored, why not start here ?
Vote with your delete key not reply all.
Sorry Jay, Just venting .... Back under my rock
The other Bob
11:39 p.m.
New subject: Off-topic but still *not* funny.
On 2/23/07, Bob Bradlee <caveguy at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
...
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/3607/bandwidthhoglw9.jpg
How is that funny? What a waste of bandwidth...
Ignoreing content, this was not a great wast of bandwidth.
The message that started this was only 120 bytes of text encased in a 3.7kemail,
including headers, by the time
it got to me. From my viewpoint at least it had a tinyurl and not a 3 line
url, and was easily ignored.
Not including this minor rant, there have been no less than 5 messages
about the OT content of those 130
charettors totaling close to 19.5k of email.
To put this back on topic, these messages including headers representing
more total storage than was available
on my first two computers (the first one SDK80 only had 2k) and my second
an EVK300 only had 16k. What we
are talking about here is equal to about 1 second of a single stream of
talk radio on my audio server. Now if you
want to talk about a huge waste of bandwidth ....
So much in life needs to be ignored, why not start here ?
Vote with your delete key not reply all.
Sorry Jay, Just venting .... Back under my rock
The other Bob
24 Feb
24 Feb
11:45 a.m.
New subject: Off-topic but still *not* funny.
You wrote...
Once again... start trimming your replies.
Jay
12:58 p.m.
New subject: Trimming replies (was Re: Off-topic but still *not* funny.)
Actually, that was meant to be a private email, not a post to the list.
My apologies, but it doesn't hurt to remind others as well ;)
Jay
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay West" <jwest at classiccmp.org>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: Off-topic but still *not* funny.
You wrote...
Once again... start trimming your replies.
Jay
26 Feb
26 Feb
2:31 p.m.
New subject: Off-topic but still *not* funny.
--- Bob Bradlee <caveguy at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Wow. Radios talk nowadays? What a concept LOL
How is that
funny? What a waste of bandwidth...
Ignoreing content, this was not a great wast of
bandwidth.
The message that started this was only 120 bytes of
text encased in a 3.7k email, including headers, by
the time
it got to me. From my viewpoint at least it had a
tinyurl and not a 3 line url, and was easily
ignored.
Not including this minor rant, there have been no
less than 5 messages about the OT content of those
130
charettors totaling close to 19.5k of email.
To put this back on topic, these messages including
headers representing more total storage than was
available
on my first two computers (the first one SDK80 only
had 2k) and my second an EVK300 only had 16k. What
we
are talking about here is equal to about 1 second of
a single stream of talk radio on my audio server. Now if you
want to talk about a huge waste of bandwidth ....
Dude...tell me about it. Icarumba! LOL LOL LOL
So much in life needs to be ignored, why not start
here ?
YEAH MAYBE WE SHOOD'VE STARTED BEFORE WE ALL READ
THIS!! OMG OMG LOL LOL LOL OMG
Vote with your delete key not reply all.
Sorry Jay, Just venting .... Back under my rock
The other Bob
And stay there BOB! LOL LOL
*kidding but of course* ;)
____________________________________________________________________________________
Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index
6434
days inactive
6437
days old
10 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
bpope＠wordstock.com -
caveguy＠sbcglobal.net -
chrism3667＠yahoo.com -
evan＠snarc.net -
fireflyst＠earthlink.net -
hexstar＠gmail.com -
jwest＠classiccmp.org -
ragooman＠comcast.net