On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Davison, Lee wrote:
My OCR does fine at 150 dpi on nearly everything and
is much
faster than working with 600 dpi source. The spellchecker gets
most of the errors. It has to, I can't spell.
That's what counts.
A good context sensitive OCR program should be able to operate at well
BELOW the source resolution -- it needs to differentiate the characters,
not necessarily see all features. (for example: serifs) And with good
enough context sensitivity, a lot of them can be interpolated even if not
recognizable.
This message has been checked for all known viruses by
Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
Is Outlook, etc. so incredibly porous that it's necessary to scan plain
text messages??
Are you the one whose system sends an automated response every time
somebody sends an infected attachment to the list?
--
Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin(a)xenosoft.com