On 01/02/12 21:13, Tony Duell wrote:
of pairs of wires. Moving wires in the mdidle of
an already-soldered=20
mini-DIN is a lot worse than SMD rework :-)
Try repairing the upper right corner of an A3000 motherboard some time.
That's the bit with all the fine-pitch tracks running under the Podule
connector.
This damage was caused by me mentioning to a friend "I need to take the
motherboard out and drill a hole in the case for the I2C DIN socket..."
He took a B&D drill, loaded a 10mm bit and drilled the case. With the
motherboard still installed.
"Oh, I thought you'd already removed the motherboard...?"
ARGH! That's not pleasant...
I asume the next workpiece that drill was used on was your (ex?-) friend ;-)
I did it with a Metcal MFR-1110, the 0.4mm conical bit and some
wire-wrap wire. It wasn't fun, and it wasn't easy, but it's electrically
sound and the Podule socket actually works now... :)
If it wasn't for the round profile of the tracks and the silver plating
(instead of green solder mask) it'd look fairly original. Now I just
need to find some instructions for replacing the Caps / Num / Scroll,
Power and Disk LEDs on the keyboard assembly.
Is this the clipped-togheter membranee keyboard that Acorn used at one
point? If o, I thin it comes apart from the bottom (unclip the metal
backing plate, then take off the memberane layers). The LEds have their
leadouts bent over the keyboard moulding and come into contact with pads
on one of the membrane sheets.
It's worth making sure it;s not contact trouble between the LED and the
seeht before you replace them.
button
swithces on the front), but also with an Acorn mouse that had=20
had the 9 pin mini-DIN cut off and been rewired to a DE9 plug to fit th=
e=20
MG1.
Meh. The MG1 is infinitely cooler than (almost) any Acorn. A working
True :-) It's just a pity the origianl ownder didn't just replace the
switch caps on the Depraz mouse. At least he kept said mouse and gave it
to me with the machine.
Phoebe would be the only thing that could hope to come
close (and as I
understand it, there's only one of those -- an escaped prototype).
I repired the original mouse (I had some suitable
switches in the
junk box, and the buttons just clop on) but of course I also kept the=20
Acorn one. But it's no use on an Acorn machine any more.
Especially now 9P Mini-DINs are basically unobtainium.
Do RS no longer do them? I';ve not looked for years...
It's possibel I have 1 or 2 in the junk box, but it'd take me some time
to dfidn them. And they'll be the massive solder-on type.
Actually,
I could probably route one through the back. There are some
pads on the board marked "ALTERNATE MOUSE" which appear to connect to
the mouse socket. I'd sooner hide a PIC micro and a PS/2 socket inside
though. Get rid of the external adapter entirely :)
=20
Are those pads at a suitalbe spacing to fit some kind of plug to the PC=
B=20
(e.g. a Molex KK)? If so, fit it and make
whatever plug-in adapter you=20
need...
Indeed. Using Mk.1 Eyeball, they're 0.1in pitch. A KK would probably
Watch out.. As you must know by now, there are 2.5mm pitch and 0.1" pitch
connecotrs, and it matters on something with 9 or 10 pins...
fit, though I'd be more tempted to use a Harwin
machined-pin header
(smaller pins, more likely to fit through the tiny holes).
Right...
The board's been wave soldered though, so the holes are full of solder...
Yes, but you know how to clear those (heat from one side, suck from the
other).
I agree. I hade mini-DINs, They are painful to
wire, and don't make goo=
d=20
contact even when new. Are they really a DIN
standard, or are they name=
d=20
miniDIN simply becuase they look like a smaller
version of the well-kno=
wn=20
audio conenctor?
Pass on that one. What are your thoughts on the full-size DIN connector?
The connector isn;t too bad, athough I wish the isulator round the pins
was made of a plastic with a higher melting point. Often at least one pin
moves out of the right position when you solder them.
But the standrd audio wirign has the same problems as RS232 only worse.
The original 3 pin DIN was used to link a tape recorder to an amplifier
(mono) using a straight-through cable. This menas that pin 1 is an
output on the amplifier and an input on the recorder (signal to record),
pin 3 is an output o nthe recordfer and an input on the amplifier
(palyback signal) and pin 2 is ground, Ok so far...
The problem comes when it's used fro things that aren't ampliifers or
recorders. At least one respected manufacturer says a singal source
should output on pin 3 if it's intended ot conenct to an amplidier, and
ouput on pin 1 if it's intended to connect to a tape recorder. How the
heck should I (as the designer of said signal sourve) know what it's
likely to be conencted to.
Of course if the pinout is wrong you can wire a corssover cable.
Stereo doens't make matters any worse. There were 2 more pins added, pin 4
betwee npins 1 nad 2 and pin 5 between pins 3 and 2. The orignal pins 1
and 3 carry the left cahnnel signals, the new pins carry the right
channel signal in the same direction as the adjacent pin. So no extra
problems
So it's like the null-modem problem with RS232, but worse i nthat all
chassis connectors are sockets. So you can't tell by looking which way
it's wored (withRS232 , a DTE shoudl be male, a DCE should be female fo
course).
I thought those were fairly decent, if a little big.
My A3000 uses a
5pin 180-degree full-size DIN for the I2C connector. I have a Solidisk
I think I'd have used a 240 degree one there. It's less likely to get
mis-connected to an audio device.
Teletext adapter which plugs into that, though
it's scarcely any use now
there's no Teletext to receive. Maybe one day I'll build a VBI
inserter/databridge to go with it...
:-).
Now the phono connector... don't get me started on that one. Whoever
decided that the signal pin should make contact before ground should
have been subjected to a very painful end... Jack plugs are worse
Indeed... There are some phone plubs with a sliding sleeve on the outside
so tha the froudn makes first, but they are not common...
though. Short-circuit on hot-connect, crosstalk, pops
'n' snaps
a-plenty, shoddy strain relief grips...
Indeed. The _original_ use of the jack plug, on telephone switchboards,
was quite sensible, in that it made use of the fact you could touch the
tip of a plug to the sleeve (mouting bush) of a socket. An operator would
do that wit hte plug of the interconneing cable to the socket of the lien
to be connected to, and if there was a click in the operator's headset,
it meant the line was in use (voltage on the sleeve connection).
The oriignal wiring of the 4 pole Plug 420 was sensible too. It was used
for the operator's headset (mouthpiece and headphones), the headphoens
were connected between tip and sleeve (ring nearest to the body), so they
were not conencted until the plug was fully home -- so no clicks as the
plug contacts touched other contacts in the socket
But dont;' get be started on the wiring of Plug 420 and Plug 505 for
British telephones (this is sort-of on-topic becuse the latter was used
for Viewdata sets). I have found 15 wiring schemes so far... A telephone
is wired differnetly to am answering amchine which is wired differnetly
to a fax machine. Heck a telephone for 1 phone-at-a-time plugged in is
wired differnetly to a telephone wired for
several-phones-plugged-in-at-ocne...ARGH. I have this little multi-way
switchbox to sort it all out...
But not for audio... My biggest moan ins that there is no compatibiltiy
between mono and stereo. If you plug a 2 conecutor plug into a 3
conductor socket, you end up shortign the ring on the socket to the
sleeve. This normally means groudn ign the right channel. Not good if
it's the output of an amplifier.
-tony