Fred,
"they will not be"??!? Of course I intend
to reopen.
Calling it temporary was honest at one time, but then seemed necessary
to discourage "abandonware" vultures.
Glad to hear it as I have tried a couple of times contacting you through the
website (info at xeno..) to see if you would be restarting sales.
"projects" was a euphemism for PROBLEMS.
Usually is...
I ran the company at a loss for a long time. Then, I
lost my lease,
and had a crisis of storage space. Still do. I wonder how much stuff
I can take to VCFWest, . . .
Will you be at VCFWest? I would love to meet some of the guys on the list
and put faces to names...
My best friend died in 2014
My mother died last year.
My condolences. Deaths in the family are always very tough!
I now have two houses, with enough crap to fill three.
I always intended to re-open my programming business
(and Lee
Felsenstein says that he still wants to go back and fix problems with
the Osborn design). Now that I could again, should I?
YES! But I do understand your point and it is a point many authors of old SW
make - I know other guys on this list who may still sell their old wares but
it is kept quite as they do not want the associated headaches, troubles,
work load, etc.
There are still more disk formats to add.
There are plenty of bugs to fix.
I now know ways to make it faster.
I never mastered "Installable File System" to be able to mount an alien
disk for active use, besides file transfer.
I want to add capability of working with disk images, besides physical
floppies.
I want to add flux transition board support, besides normal FDC.
But, disks needing to be converted are now finally fading away rapidly.
Wow, that is a quite a wish list and I would think many people on this list
would be very happy to see them implemented.
"Free download"/shareware software relies on minimal support
requirement, and a larger volume than is realistic to expect for this
kind of software, unless somebody else is supporting you.
(Realistically, what does it take to pay the bills?) The most
successful model for this kind of software is to do it as a hobby with
an indulgent employer, or charge [PLENTY] to also do it as a data
recovery service operation. Retail sles of it won't pay for an office
and/or wage for support staff.
I entirely agree on this point and as the years go by the volume gets
smaller and smaller. That being said I've always advocated a minimal fee/no
support model for old software that is no longer profitable to sell. That
is, if you truly do not want a commercial enterprise, you make the SW
available for purchase at a minimal fee (or no fee) and offer absolutely no
support. That way the buyer gets a non-crippled licensed copy and support is
based on the community (if there is any).
I may be too old, too tired, and too burned out to
try.
I hope not - and if you ever decide to sell XenoCopy-PC, XenoFonts, and/or
XenoComm-Parallel you have at least one ready and willing customer!
-Ali