----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Duell" <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: dryers was Re: Acquired a PDP11/44, but missing M7095
>
> The old style dryers that I've looked at used 120V timers connected
between
> one hot leg and the chassis ground. It might not
live up to the latest
and
greatest code,
but I was never shocked by one. YMMV.
I think the main hazard is if the earth/neutral wire becomes
open-circuit, then the frame of the drier becomes live via the timer
motor windings, which are not that high impedance. I don't like large,
live, metal objects around, particularly if there's also water about (and
this would be likely near a clothes drier).
That's why there are separate neutral and earth wires, even if they are
then connected together at one point in the installation. If the neutral
wire breaks, the device fails to work, but it doesn't become live. If the
earth wire breaks, the device carries on working, but will become live
_if another fault develops_. Combine the 2 into one wire, and if that
breaks, the device stops work _and_ becomes live.
I understand the problems it can cause. My problems with these sort of
regulatory agencies are their complete arrogance and flighty nature. Every
three years, they come out with a new Code. Which is fine, but they
absolutely *insist* that the current Code is the most safe, and that all
others are unsafe. The problem I see with that statement is that they said
the exact same thing three years earlier, and look what became of that... I
just can't see a committee publishing the best of anything, let alone
something as complex as this.
Note: I do think the Code gets better and better. I follow it with all my
work. Please read, understand, and follow the Code when working with
electricity!
-tony
Bob