Yes, and I seem to remember that an other reason to use the 1802
was because RCA exactly specified what the CPU would do on *any*
"opcode", even for the codes that were not actually instruction codes?
- Henk, PA8PDP.
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Pete Turnbull
Sent: maandag 2 januari 2006 14:51
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: 1802 problems
On Dec 31 2005, 0:56, Roger Pugh wrote:
could this be a ram problem. wasnt the rca 1802
used a lot on
satellites due to its reliability
It was used because there was a rad-hard silicon-on-sapphire
version, and then some people used the standard versions so
they could use the same code and tools.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
This message and attachment(s) are intended solely for the use of the addressee and may
contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure
under applicable law.
If you are not the intended recipient or agent thereof responsible for delivering this
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone and with a "reply" message.
Thank you for your cooperation.