NB: MINIMUM
requirements are NOT to be confused with RECOMMENDED
configuration. Particularly when it gets to issues of "acceptable
performance".
This is the major impediment. Like the 386SX running 95. It worked, but it
was
such a slug that we put 3.11 back on it after 2 days of tinkering. That
improved it's
performance significantly. I have seen a 386DX40 running Win95. It was a
little slow,
but still useable.
Cheers
Geoff
Computer Room Internet Cafe
That's odd. I had an SX-33 386 that (not counting bootup) actually ran things
a bit faster under 95 than it did under 3.11
(This with 4megs ram and an 80mb harddisk)
Les