27 Aug
1998
27 Aug
'98
6:15 a.m.
Speaking of the emulator...
I'm curious if anyone has any more disk images I can experiment with?
Technically, the license included with the emulator covers all older
DEC operating systems, for non-commercial emulator use only. I would
LOVE to get a disk or tape image of a full RSTS or RSX11-M+ environment
I could play with on the emulator.
Thank you for pointing this out... if, in fact, this is as it appears
(and I just down-loaded the rt image from gatekeeper to read the license),
then we seem to be able to run RT-11 V5.3 or earlier, RSTS V9.6 or
earlier, or RSX-11M V4.3 or earlier. If so, and I want to confirm
this first, I have a copy of the V5.3 distribution of RT-11 I could
make available...
Does anyone have such disk images available? And could
they share them?
(Unless I'm very much mistaken, it's legal under the emulator license)
It sure seems to be... I thought it used to state (for example) an
execute-only (RT^2) version of RT V4.0... This is a nice development.
I'll check it out today...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of ' ' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
27 Aug
27 Aug
5:27 p.m.
Megan wrote:
Thank you for pointing this out... if, in fact, this
is as it appears
(and I just down-loaded the rt image from gatekeeper to read the license),
then we seem to be able to run RT-11 V5.3 or earlier, RSTS V9.6 or
earlier, or RSX-11M V4.3 or earlier. If so, and I want to confirm
this first, I have a copy of the V5.3 distribution of RT-11 I could
make available...
Jerome Fine replies:
That would be great. Are you referring to both the binaries and the
update package or just the binaries?
Does anyone
have such disk images available? And could they share them?
(Unless I'm very much mistaken, it's legal under the emulator license)
It
sure seems to be... I thought it used to state (for example) an
execute-only (RT^2) version of RT V4.0... This is a nice development.
I'll check it out today...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of ' ' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+ 
5:25 p.m.
Plus, I understand that the Bob Supnick emulator -
which is what Mentec
does not bother to name by name is what the Mentec license refers to.
Does anyone know if there is a version which runs under MS-DOS or
Windows 95/98? I realize that the Bob Supnick emulator is written in
"C" and normally runs under UNIX. Does that mean that it can't run
under MS-DOS, or is it just that no one has ever tried?
Sincerely yours,
Jerome Fine
RT-11/TSX-PLUS User/Addict
Year 2000 Solutions for Legacy RT-11 Applications
(Sources not always required)
To the best of my knowledge no one has tried (especially since E11
runs under DOS already). I'd love to see the Supnick emulators
under Windows (3.1 or 95) with a graphical front panel like the Doug
Jones PDP8 emulator under X11.
Imagine real toggle switches and 11/45 emulation running V7 or the RT11
RSTS/E or RSX light pattern (all different) showing up in real-time...
Any Visual C/Borland C types want to try it?
Bill
6:30 p.m.
Bill Pechter wrote:
Plus, I
understand that the Bob Supnick emulator - which is what Mentec
does not bother to name by name is what the Mentec license refers to.
Does anyone know if there is a version which runs under MS-DOS or
Windows 95/98? I realize that the Bob Supnick emulator is written in
"C" and normally runs under UNIX. Does that mean that it can't run
under MS-DOS, or is it just that no one has ever tried?
To the best of my
knowledge no one has tried (especially since E11
runs under DOS already). I'd love to see the Supnick emulators
under Windows (3.1 or 95) with a graphical front panel like the Doug
Jones PDP8 emulator under X11.
Imagine real toggle switches and 11/45 emulation running V7 or the RT11
RSTS/E or RSX light pattern (all different) showing up in real-time...
Any Visual C/Borland C types want to try it? 
8:33 p.m.
Any Visual
C/Borland C types want to try it?
Jerome Fine replies:
A friend of mine says he has an old version of Borland Turbo C 2.0
that runs under MS-DOS. Would that do the job? 
28 Aug
28 Aug
12:48 a.m.
New subject: Apollos in St Louis
Not from me, from this guy:
<<
I have 2 complete 3500's available for a good home.
Includes the Color monitors. You must be able
to pick up in the St. Louis area. Hardware only,
I wasn't able to save the tapes or the books....
24 meg ram(??), 340 meg ESDI, token ring (???),
ethernet, and 15" color monitors, keyboard, mouse.
Working before I caught them taking them to the
dumpster....
Email if interested...
wbrco(a)valuenet.net
Thanks!
Allen
--
| Allen Underdown - wbrco(a)valuenet.net |
| Amateur Radio Operator - N0GOM, computer geek, |
| homebrewer and outdoor enthusiast! |
| http://web.cybercon.com/wurmborn |
>
27 Aug
27 Aug
5:53 p.m.
The Supnik emulator runs just fine under Windows 95/98.
I use Visual Studio 97 (VC++ 5.0) to build it. You have
to run in in an MS-DOS box, so you don't have a VT52/VT100
terminal. One click and you have RT-11 V4.0C on your desktop.
Or Unix V7.
Jerome Fine wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a version which runs under MS-DOS or
Windows 95/98? I realize that the Bob Supnick emulator is written in
"C" and normally runs under UNIX. Does that mean that it can't run
under MS-DOS, or is it just that no one has ever tried?
28 Aug
28 Aug
2:04 a.m.
The Supnik emulator runs just fine under Windows
95/98.
I use Visual Studio 97 (VC++ 5.0) to build it. You have
to run in in an MS-DOS box, so you don't have a VT52/VT100
terminal. One click and you have RT-11 V4.0C on your desktop.
Or Unix V7.
Jerome Fine wrote:
Hmm... sounds like someone should zip it up and get it to gatekeeper.dec.com.
Someone should add vt100 emulation next. I wish I was good enough at C
to consider an attempt.
Bill
Does anyone know if there is a version which runs under MS-DOS or
Windows 95/98? I realize that the Bob Supnick emulator is written in
"C" and normally runs under UNIX. Does that mean that it can't run
under MS-DOS, or is it just that no one has ever tried?
3:50 a.m.
It IS what's at gatekeeper.dec.com. Exactly. No need to zip up
anything. Just make a workspace with a project for existing files.
If you mean the executable, because you may not have a way to compile
it, sure, the .exe could be put somewhere for FTP. I'm not sure
gatekeeper is the right place, so I'll put it at my public FTP for now.
Try ftp://ftp.halcyon.com/djenner/PDP11.zip .
This is a 32-bit application, by the way. You'll need
to be running Windows 95/98 or NT. I haven't tried making a 16-bit
build; that'd require going back to VC++ 1.52. Perhaps someone else
has that or Borland and can try it for DOS.
Dave
Bill Pechter wrote:
> The Supnik emulator runs just fine under Windows 95/98.
> I use Visual Studio 97 (VC++ 5.0) to build it. You have
> to run in in an MS-DOS box, so you don't have a VT52/VT100
> terminal. One click and you have RT-11 V4.0C on your desktop.
> Or Unix V7.
Hmm... sounds like someone should zip it up and get it
to gatekeeper.dec.com.
Someone should add vt100 emulation next. I wish I was good enough at C
to consider an attempt.
Bill
3:59 a.m.
Opps! Make that
ftp://ftp.halcyon.com/pub/users/djenner/PDP11.zip
David C. Jenner wrote:
It IS what's at gatekeeper.dec.com. Exactly. No need to zip up
anything. Just make a workspace with a project for existing files.
If you mean the executable, because you may not have a way to compile
it, sure, the .exe could be put somewhere for FTP. I'm not sure
gatekeeper is the right place, so I'll put it at my public FTP for now.
Try ftp://ftp.halcyon.com/djenner/PDP11.zip .
This is a 32-bit application, by the way. You'll need
to be running Windows 95/98 or NT. I haven't tried making a 16-bit
build; that'd require going back to VC++ 1.52. Perhaps someone else
has that or Borland and can try it for DOS.
Dave
Bill Pechter wrote:
> The Supnik emulator runs just fine under Windows 95/98.
> I use Visual Studio 97 (VC++ 5.0) to build it. You have
> to run in in an MS-DOS box, so you don't have a VT52/VT100
> terminal. One click and you have RT-11 V4.0C on your desktop.
> Or Unix V7.
> Hmm... sounds like someone should zip it up and get it to gatekeeper.dec.com.
>
> Someone should add vt100 emulation next. I wish I was good enough at C
> to consider an attempt.
>
> Bill
6:54 p.m.
David C. Jenner wrote:
Opps! Make that
ftp://ftp.halcyon.com/pub/users/djenner/PDP11.zip
Jerome Fine replies:
Just what the PDP11 ordered. Thanks! I passed the URL along
to a friend of mine and he says it works as it is intended to!!!
> Bill Pechter wrote:
> > Someone should add vt100 emulation next. I wish I was good enough at C
> > to consider an attempt.
That would be a very valuable aspect. Does any version of the Supnick emulator
have VT100 emulation?
Sincerely yours,
Jerome Fine
RT-11/TSX-PLUS User/Addict
7:03 p.m.
That would be a very valuable aspect. Does any version
of the Supnick
emulator have VT100 emulation?
No... the emulator package is designed to emulate the processor (and
some devices) only.
It is somewhat expected that you run it with at least something that
looks like an acceptable terminal to you...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
9:11 p.m.
No... the emulator package is designed to emulate the
processor (and
some devices) only.
It is somewhat expected that you run it with at least something that
looks like an acceptable terminal to you...
OK, here is a Linuxy sort of question. It works terrific for the most part
if I run it from the console, but if I try to run it from a Xterm under
X-Windows, the keybindings are all messed up. Is anyone running it under
Linux and X-Windows (I'm trying to remember if I've got the same problem
under AIX on a RS6k).
I've also got problems with KED saving wierd strings of words to my data
files when I save a text file. I'm about ready to hook one of my VT
terminals up to the P2 so I've got an actual DEC terminal that I can run
this stuff on and see if that helps, but it is a MAJOR pain to get to the
back of the system to plug the cable in :^(
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
8:24 p.m.
New subject: Help on my MicroVAX 2000
It would appear that I am in dire need of some guidance in how to bring
up my MicroVAX 2000. To bring things up to a current baseline, it is
equipped with 14Mb of RAM, an RD54 HD, external connection option, and
has a TK50Z-FA connected to it.
Except for a flat battery, the uVAX seems to pass all the tests, and the
tape drive seems functional. Unfortunately, I have no documentation on
this hardware except pieces that I have picked up from this list, the
FAQ, and other odd pieces picked up on various websites.
I have on hand several tapes for VMS - v5.4 and 5.5 - most but not all
say that they are binary. Some are characterized as 'mandatory update'.
At any rate, after inserting the tape (#1) in the drive, closing the
door, and pressing the illuminated red pushbutton, I enter 'b/1 mua0' at
the terminal. After some passage of time (accompanied by whirring
sounds and flashing lights), I see on the screen:
-MUA0
Then later:
%VMB-F-ERR, PC = 00000765
%VMB-I-STS, R0 = 000008C2
84 FAIL
>>
If I attempt to boot with a known non bootable tape, the screen is the
same except that instead of '84 FAIL' it displays:
?06 HLT INST
PC = 00000E64
>>
Regrettably, I have neither the experience nor the documentation to get
me any further at this point. I really need some pointers and/or help!
Thanks.
- don
29 Aug
29 Aug
12:56 a.m.
New subject: Help on my MicroVAX 2000
Don wondered:
the terminal. After some passage of time (accompanied
by whirring
sounds and flashing lights), I see on the screen:
-MUA0
That's the old way of writing muhhahha. Ghost in the machine, I think...
R.
--
Warbaby
The WebSite. The Domain. The Empire.
http://www.warbaby.com
The MonkeyPool
WebSite Content Development
http://www.monkeypool.com
Dreadlocks on white boys give me the willies.
6:44 a.m.
That would be a very valuable aspect. Does any
version of the Supnick
emulator have VT100 emulation?
No... the emulator package is designed to emulate the processor (and
some devices) only.
It is somewhat expected that you run it with at least something that
looks like an acceptable terminal to you...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
8:18 a.m.
At least the Unix boxes all can do Xterm or Rxvt for
VT100
(and I guess eventually I'll get the keymaps figured out.)
WARNING, depending on the version of UNIX that you are running, you might
need to run it from the command line, instead of under X-Windows in a
Xterm. On my P2 running RedHat 5.1, I can get the keys to work properly
from the command line, but under X-Windows.
Right now I'm wondering if it will compile using GCC for VMS :^)
Zane
On MS-DOS there's not much except fansi console or nansi.sys for good
vt100 emulation. Nansi has some problems on some new boxes. I haven't
heard much about fansi console since it went mostly commercial.
Bill
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
8:27 a.m.
Right now I'm wondering if it will compile using
GCC for VMS :^)
I'm not sure about gcc specifically, but there are directions in the docs
for building it under VMS. Bob Supnik works for DEC, after all! (Well,
COMPAQ I suppose... :-( )
Kevin
--
Kevin McQuiggin VE7ZD
mcquiggi(a)sfu.ca
10:58 a.m.
In <v04011702b20de7b999c4(a)[207.220.33.85]>5]>, on 08/29/98
at 09:18 AM, "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com> said:
Right now I'm wondering if it will compile using
GCC for VMS :^)
Yup, it does. Run it on my VAXstations. Quite nice.
--
Dann Lunsford * The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil *
dann(a)greycat.com * is that men of good will do nothing. -- Cicero *
"One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promotional Ad
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
28 Aug
28 Aug
8:06 a.m.
On Fri, 28 Aug 1998, David C. Jenner wrote:
This is a 32-bit application, by the way. You'll
need
to be running Windows 95/98 or NT. I haven't tried making a 16-bit
build; that'd require going back to VC++ 1.52. Perhaps someone else
has that or Borland and can try it for DOS.
I can make a 16-bit version if someone throws the complete source my way.
If there are problems I won't go into them because I just don't have time,
but if it compiles straight on the first try then of course I'll stash the
.EXE where ever it would be appropriate for others to get at.
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever onward.
September 26 & 27...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 08/25/98]
12:52 p.m.
David C. Jenner wrote:
It IS what's at gatekeeper.dec.com. Exactly. No
need to zip up
anything. Just make a workspace with a project for existing files.
If you mean the executable, because you may not have a way to compile
it, sure, the .exe could be put somewhere for FTP. I'm not sure
gatekeeper is the right place, so I'll put it at my public FTP for now.
Try ftp://ftp.halcyon.com/djenner/PDP11.zip .
This is a 32-bit application, by the way. You'll need
to be running Windows 95/98 or NT. I haven't tried making a 16-bit
build; that'd require going back to VC++ 1.52. Perhaps someone else
has that or Borland and can try it for DOS.
Dave
Bill Pechter wrote:
Jerome Fine replies:
Thanks very much. I have a friend who does not bother much with the internet,
but I will pass this address along. Also, based on what Bill Pechter said, could
you also put the sources and documentation there as well? It is good to know
that alternatives do exist.
However, the big question is whether Mentec actually honours the copy of the
LICENSE AGREEMENT that was found. Has anyone that is reading this
post actually had a copy signed by Mentec? If you don't want to put your
license at risk (Mentec can cancel it on 30 days notice), please do not respond!
Sincerely yours,
Jerome Fine
RT-11/TSX-PLUS User/Addict
> The Supnik emulator runs just fine under Windows 95/98.
> I use Visual Studio 97 (VC++ 5.0) to build it. You have
> to run in in an MS-DOS box, so you don't have a VT52/VT100
> terminal. One click and you have RT-11 V4.0C on your desktop.
> Or Unix V7.
> Hmm... sounds like someone should zip it up and get it to gatekeeper.dec.com.
>
> Someone should add vt100 emulation next. I wish I was good enough at C
> to consider an attempt.
>
> Bill
3 p.m.
Jerome Fine wrote:
> but I will pass this address along. Also, based on what Bill Pechter said, could
> you also put the sources and documentation there as well? It is good to know
> that alternatives do exist.
No. I see no reason to duplicate what's at gatekeeper. In fact, it's
dangerous. There should be one, official source. If you are
really into it, download the original source, and devise a build that
works for you.
If I have a chance, I'll try finding my VC++ 1.52 and try building for
DOS, but right now I don't know where it is in the pile!
Dave
6:54 p.m.
David C. Jenner wrote:
but I will
pass this address along. Also, based on what Bill Pechter said, could
you also put the sources and documentation there as well? It is good to know
that alternatives do exist.
No. I see no reason to duplicate what's at
gatekeeper. In fact, it's
dangerous. There should be one, official source. If you are
really into it, download the original source, and devise a build that
works for you.
If I have a chance, I'll try finding my VC++ 1.52 and try building for
DOS, but right now I don't know where it is in the pile!
7:01 p.m.
Also, is there a DOC file?
The documentation for the emulator comes in the source package...
Finally, he did attempt to figure out what was involved
in getting the
sources. But, due to his lack of understanding of how the files are
packaged, he gave up. Plus, if the MS-DOS version is equally
lacking in VT100 support, he does not see much point in spending
the time to set up that version.
The files are in a tar archive (.tar) which is then compressed (.Z)
This is similar to what happens with .zip files (archived and
compressed in one step).
On one hand, your friend could learn how to use a unix machine to
get the files and unpack them, and on the other hand, maybe someone
should take all the files which comprise the current kit and create
an equivalent .zip file and put it on gatekeeper...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
30 Aug
30 Aug
1:38 p.m.
If you run any sort of Windows, it's worth getting the (sharware)
program WinZip. It handles almost any type of compression/archiving
transparently, including all Unix-style stuff.
I guess I am so used to it, that I don't notice the difference between
downloading a .ZIP file or a .TAR.Z file. WinZip gets me into both
of them almost identically.
If you're in DOS, there are command-line programs that will unzip,
ungzip, untar, uudecode, etc. It's worth having those around, too.
Dave
Megan wrote:
Also, is there a DOC file?
The documentation for the emulator comes in the source package...
Finally, he did attempt to figure out what was
involved in getting the
sources. But, due to his lack of understanding of how the files are
packaged, he gave up. Plus, if the MS-DOS version is equally
lacking in VT100 support, he does not see much point in spending
the time to set up that version.
The files are in a tar archive (.tar) which is then compressed (.Z)
This is similar to what happens with .zip files (archived and
compressed in one step).
On one hand, your friend could learn how to use a unix machine to
get the files and unpack them, and on the other hand, maybe someone
should take all the files which comprise the current kit and create
an equivalent .zip file and put it on gatekeeper...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
28 Aug
28 Aug
12:52 p.m.
Bill Pechter wrote:
The Supnik
emulator runs just fine under Windows 95/98.
I use Visual Studio 97 (VC++ 5.0) to build it. You have
to run in in an MS-DOS box, so you don't have a VT52/VT100
terminal. One click and you have RT-11 V4.0C on your desktop.
Or Unix V7.
Hmm... sounds like someone should zip it up and get it to
gatekeeper.dec.com.
Someone should add vt100 emulation next. I wish I was good enough at C
to consider an attempt. 
1:04 p.m.
At 05:52 PM 8/28/98 -0400, Jerome Fine wrote:
>
> Someone should add vt100 emulation next. I wish I was good enough at C
> to consider an attempt.
How much of the VT-100 emulation does it need? Won't preloading
of ANSI.SYS supply some of it?
A graphical user interface - blinken lights, pretend switches -
would really open up this emulator. I'd recompiled this emulator
for Win32 once upon a time, too. The main() loop is simple enough,
it could be tied to buttons and menu events.
- John
27 Aug
27 Aug
7:27 p.m.
That would be great. Are you referring to both the
binaries and the
update package or just the binaries?
I don't have any update packages... so it would only be the
V5.3 binary distribution.
I also think I read that someone else may have a set of
RX50 diskettes
as well. Would that qualify? And how should V5.3 of RT-11 be made
available - assuming that the license form which I have seen is the real
thing? And are there any restrictions implicit in the utilities which
would be used to transfer V5.3 into the environment of the OS in which
the emulator would be run?
If the question of the license is resolved in the positive, then I could
make available image copies of any of the distribution media with the
exception of magtapes.
Plus, I understand that the Bob Supnick emulator -
which is what Mentec
does not bother to name by name is what the Mentec license refers to.
Does anyone know if there is a version which runs under MS-DOS or
Windows 95/98? I realize that the Bob Supnick emulator is written in
"C" and normally runs under UNIX. Does that mean that it can't run
under MS-DOS, or is it just that no one has ever tried?
I've heard of people taking the makefile I wrote for it and making
modifications so that it would build using some flavor of C on MS/DOS.
(And this has been borne out by the post from someone who said they
built it and use it).
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of ' ' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
9492
days inactive
9495
days old
27 comments
12 participants
participants (12)
-
dann＠greycat.com -
dastar＠ncal.verio.com -
djenner＠halcyon.com -
donm＠cts.com -
healyzh＠ix.netcom.com -
jfoust＠threedee.com -
jhfine＠idirect.com -
mbg＠world.std.com -
mcquiggi＠sfu.ca -
pechter＠pechter.dyn.ml.org -
rax＠warbaby.com -
yowza＠yowza.com