20 Feb
2003
20 Feb
'03
10:31 a.m.
OR you can get a copy of MS-DOS 4.00 and patch it to
run on the Z-100.
Jeez, Joe, now I'm really gagging. MS-DOS on a Z-100? Yuck.
Later --
Glen
0/0
20 Feb
20 Feb
10:57 a.m.
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 acme(a)ao.net wrote:
The Z-100 was intended as a dual OS machine. You had the best
(presumably) of both worlds: CP/M and MS-DOS.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
OR you can get
a copy of MS-DOS 4.00 and patch it to run on the Z-100.
Jeez, Joe, now I'm really gagging. MS-DOS on a Z-100? Yuck. 
11:18 a.m.
At 04:49 PM 2/20/03 -0800, Sellam wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 acme(a)ao.net wrote:
The Z-100 was intended as a dual OS machine. You had the best
(presumably) of both worlds: CP/M and MS-DOS.
You forgot to include CPM-86.
Joe
OR you
can get a copy of MS-DOS 4.00 and patch it to run on the Z-100.
Jeez, Joe, now I'm really gagging. MS-DOS on a Z-100? Yuck.
11:06 a.m.
At 07:26 PM 2/20/03 -0500, Glen wrote:
Bitch! Bitch! Bitch! You'd complain if they hung you with a new rope!
Joe :-)
PS went scrounging this afternoon after I talked to you. I came back with a car FULL of
HP 18x o'scope mainframes!
OR you can get
a copy of MS-DOS 4.00 and patch it to run on the Z-100.
Jeez, Joe, now I'm really gagging. MS-DOS on a Z-100? Yuck.
7929
days inactive
7929
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
acme＠ao.net -
rigdonj＠cfl.rr.com -
vcf＠siconic.com