David Betz wrote:
Cool. Thanks! I wonder if it can boot RT-11?
Jerome Fine replies:
RT-11 can boot any device which looks like a
disk drive - for which there is also the boot
code in the device driver. Thus far I am not
aware of any such devices that do not have
the needed boot code, including the DD(X).SYS
device driver for the TU-58.
There is, of course, ONE exception - the
LD(X).SYS device driver which is DEC's answer
in RT-11 for sub-directories.
Or maybe I should just run simh... I'm not really a
hardware guy anyway!
If you first want to become experienced with RT-11
without all the hardware problems, then there are
several V05.03 RT-11 distributions available. One
of those distributions also includes all of the prior
RT-11 distributions. The file, RT11DV10.ISO.zip is at:
http://www.classiccmp.org/PDP-11/RT-11/dists/
Note that you can actually boot the CD that can be
burned from RT11DV10.ISO (after you UnZip the file).
Or if you run SIMH, you can:
ATTACH RQ0: RT11DV10.ISO
SET RQ0: LOCK
BOOT RQ0:
to run V05.03 of RT-11. Of course, you can also legally
run under E11 if you purchase an RT-11 license from Mentec
for about $ US 900 (the latest price I have heard) and
perhaps the distribution kit for $ US 1600 (also the latest
I have heard). For hobby use, there is no charge for the
hobby use of E11. The E11 commands are:
MOUNT DU0: RT11DV10.ISO/RONLY
BOOT DU0:
If you can use some help with running RT-11, please ask
And, I'll repeat my question, does anyone have one
of these small -11
QBus boxes they'd like to sell or trade? It seems that the BA23 might
be a good choice as well.
If you really want to run on real DEC hardware, then
you obviously need some sort of disk drive as well.
Even a TU-58 needs additional space and the 4 * 4
backplane is just too small to be really useful.
The BA23 box is probably a much better solution since
there is also space for 2 * 5 1/4" drives and the power
to run them. An M7555 RQDX3 and an RX50 floppy is
probably two orders of magnitude better than a TU-58.
A hard disk drive might be a bit more difficult, although
an old ST412 at 10 MBytes looks like (actually is) an
RD51.
But until you know a bit about RT-11, I still suggest
that using an emulator is much more effective - especially
if you are running RT-11 because you want to use the
software, not the hardware. As an RT-11 software addict,
I use an emulator to run RT-11 99.9% of the time. Both
SIMH and E11 are acceptable - but even the hobby version of
E11 is, in my experience, an order of magnitude better.
Now if you want to discuss the commercial version of E11, ...
Sincerely yours,
Jerome Fine
--
If you attempted to send a reply and the original e-mail
address has been discontinued due a high volume of junk
e-mail, then the semi-permanent e-mail address can be
obtained by replacing the four characters preceding the
'at' with the four digits of the current year.