On 4/15/2013 1:44 PM, Chuck Guzis wrote:
On 04/15/2013 10:50 AM, Bryan Pope wrote:
It's becoming increasingly clear that this field of vintage computing
is becoming more the territory of the "put it in a glass case" folks
than for hobbyists.
Particularly when I saw a copy of CP/M-86 for the IBM PC sell for $250
a short time ago.
Does this happen to other interest areas? Teddy bears or Beanie
Babies as under-glass exhibits rather than as toys for children?
--Chuck
I understand the general sentiment, but I think the C65 is a poor
example of the concern.
Unlike other machines, the C65 was never completed, and has 0 software
base. It's sole value in the marketplace is as a prototype. Those of
us who own one can do little more with the unit that those without one.
Yes, it makes getting parts for the unit harder, but it's not like one
can relive the memories with a now-functioning C65, as no one had
memories with the unit in the first place.
As such, I think folks should lament the price increases of truly great
machines and rare but production systems, not the C65 and unfinished
prototypes like it.
I will concede that rising prices of machines like the C65 further
inflate the prices of more legitimate systems like the Apple I and Lisa.
Of course, in the interest of full disclosure, I own 2 functioning C65
units, and so I am biased. I have as yet not considered selling either
unit, but with the rising prices of the auctions and the limited utility
of owning such a unit, much less 2 of them, cause me to question whether
it's better to hold onto them well beyond when the C65 "bubble" bursts,
or take advantage of some collector's interest to create funds for
better purposes. I suspect 1 of the owned units would create a high
water price point for the C65, since I own the rare C65 expansion memory
card, of which I suspect there are but a handful ever made, and I own a
special diagnostic card for C65 development, of which only 1 exists.
The former is of marginal utility as it works and would allow larger
programs for the C65, and the latter is of no utility, as it was
designed for diagnosis of issues with the machine itself during development.
Jim
--
Jim Brain
brain at
jbrain.com
www.jbrain.com