22 Apr
2002
22 Apr
'02
1:06 a.m.
On April 21, William Donzelli wrote:
Ahh, ok...I suppose, then, I was vehemently agreeing with you. ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "Mmmm. Big."
St. Petersburg, FL -Den
Umm, I have
to disagree with you there...the machines in question are
indeed of a mainframe architecture, and some IBMers were calling them
"servers" many years before the zSeries was even an itch in IBM's
pants.
That is exactly what I meant...just marketting... 
22 Apr
22 Apr
1:31 a.m.
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Dave McGuire wrote:
Ahh, ok...I suppose, then, I was vehemently agreeing with you. ;)
A page on IBM's site (I think it's http://www.ibm.com/servers/eserver/ but
I'm too lazy to check) labels them "mainframe servers".
Peace... Sridhar
Umm, I have to disagree with you there...the
machines in question are
indeed of a mainframe architecture, and some IBMers were calling them
"servers" many years before the zSeries was even an itch in IBM's
pants.
That is exactly what I meant...just marketting... 
12:02 p.m.
A page on IBM's site (I think it's
http://www.ibm.com/servers/eserver/ but
I'm too lazy to check) labels them "mainframe servers".
DON"T TELL LOU!
(of course he is out of the big chair now)
William Donzelli
aw288(a)osfn.org
8299
days inactive
8299
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
aw288＠osfn.org -
mcguire＠neurotica.com -
vance＠ikickass.org