21 Oct
2011
21 Oct
'11
10:19 a.m.
I understand that the build quality of the 49G isn't up to the build
quality of the 48SX. How does the build quality (I'm mostly interested
in the build quality of the keyboard...) of the 48GX, 48GII, and 50G
compare with the 48SX? How do they compare with that of the 49G?
Peace... Sridhar
21 Oct
21 Oct
1:16 p.m.
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:19:34 -0400
Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com> wrote:
How does the build quality [...] of the 48GX, 48GII,
and 50G
compare with the 48SX? How do they compare with that of the 49G?
HP48 S/SX/G/GX
use the same enclosure and keyboard. Don't know about
the rest.
--
\end{Jochen}
\ref{http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz/}
5 p.m.
I understand that the build quality of the 49G isn't up to the build
quality of the 48SX. How does the build quality (I'm mostly interested
in the build quality of the keyboard...) of the 48GX, 48GII, and 50G
compare with the 48SX? How do they compare with that of the 49G?
AFAIK the mechaicnal construction of the 48SX, 38S, 48GX and 48G are all
the same. And the 48GII and 50G are simialr, if not indentical in quality.
IMHO the 49G is by far the worst of the lot. It's the worst keyboard on
any HP scientific calcualtor. I would say the original 48 seires is
better than the 50G, but not all that much better.
-tony
4658
days inactive
4658
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
ard＠p850ug1.demon.co.uk -
jkunz＠unixag-kl.fh-kl.de -
ploopster＠gmail.com