5 Mar
2001
5 Mar
'01
6:58 p.m.
On 2001-03-04 classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org said:
The Museums clearly serve several useful purposes,
such
that I think the "us vs. them" label is inappropriate.
Oh well. At least it got some attention. ;-) The "vs."
might just as well be thought of as "private collectors"
in *contrast* to "museum collections".
1. They are higher profile that individual enthusiats
and therefore a magnet for systems that might otherwise
end up in the dumpster or with scrappers.
What do you mean by "higher profile"? There are some private
collectors, no doubt, with noble and intelligent motives
rivaling that of some museum staffs.
2. They tend to be open to the general public making
the machines accessible to anyone who wants to see
them.
What would you suggest is the foremost reason for "seeing"
them?
3. They educate the public about the value of
preserving old computers, and introduce new people to
the hobby. (I know some may not think this is
necessarily a good thing.)
Would you suppose that there are other causes even more
significant than encouraging computers as a hobby through
museum displays?
4. The curators tend to be schooled in preservation,
and while they may not operate their machines, they
usually keep them safe, dry, etc.
Private collectors can do the same, if they wish, although
I doubt that many private collectors would enjoy "dead"
machines as well as "live" ones.
5. They can usually accommodate the very large
machines that many collectors don't have the room for.
Yes, I have seen such a museum, which has ambitious plans
for doing just that.
6. Museums can sometimes undertake restoration
projects that require the coordination of people and
resources that individuals would unlikely be able to
accomplish on their own, such as those undertaken by
The Computer Museum History Center located at Moffett
Airfield.
Is there a URL for it?
7. Museums don't sell on eBay (or sell at all for
that
matter); a number of "us" do.
Personally, I prefer to see what I'm buying first -- especially
when it's something like an old computer that I'd want to
examine closely for condition, etc..
Jerry... on his IBM PC/AT 5170 Model 339 | My laptop computer's a
***** 9600kbps/30MB HD/512k RAM/8 MHz | Tandy TRS-80 Model 100
Net-Tamer V 1.11.2X - Registered
6 Mar
6 Mar
5:39 p.m.
>1. They are higher profile that individual
enthusiats
>and therefore a magnet for systems that might
otherwise
end up in the
dumpster or with scrappers.
What do you mean by "higher profile"? There are some collectors, no doubt, with noble and intelligent
motives
rivaling that of some museum staffs.
I suppose I meant "more well known," which I probably
should have used.
>2. They tend to be open to the general public
making
>the machines accessible to anyone who wants to
see
them.
What would you suggest is the foremost reason for them?
Well in my case, I find them pleasing to look at. I
like seeing, and being able to touch, systems that I
have heard about or know about, butI do not own.
>3. They educate the public about the value of
>preserving old computers, and introduce new
people to
the hobby. (I
know some may not think this is
necessarily a good thing.)
Would you suppose that there are other causes even significant than encouraging computers as a hobby
through
museum displays?
Of course, but that doesn't mean that there's anything
wrong with it.
>4. The curators tend to be schooled in
preservation,
>and while they may not operate their machines,
they
usually keep
them safe, dry, etc.
Private collectors can do the same, if they wish, I doubt that many private collectors would enjoy
"dead"
machines as well as "live" ones.
Yes, they can. I didn't intend that a negative
inference be drawn for all collectors.
>6. Museums can sometimes undertake
restoration
>projects that require the coordination of people
and
>resources that individuals would unlikely be
able
to
>accomplish on their own, such as those
undertaken
by
>The Computer Museum History Center located at
Moffett
Airfield.
Is there a URL for it?
8691
days inactive
8692
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
jerryjh＠imt.net -
wmsmith＠earthlink.net