No, but the complete issues are on Google Books. I discovered that by accident. ---------------------------------------------

Eh..."you can" using "alternate methods". Google "dowloading google books" :o)

http://www.aboutonlinetips.com/google-books-downloader/ Easiest is number 3, Greasemonkey version. Actually puts a disk icon off to the side of the page, click on it and it brings up the entire page image completely saveable (jpg format). Marty On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Evan Koblentz <evan at snarc.net> wrote:

On 4/13/10, Alexandre Souza - Listas <pu1bzz.listas at gmail.com> wrote: I've not had a problem with *most* of the footprints in Eagle (OTOH, I do solder 805-sized parts without magnification), but occasionally, there's a part that is less than ideal - in particular, there's a 40-pin DIP footprint with big, huge pads (right out of the 1970s, like the size you get from rub-off transfers) but the associated drill holes are barely big enough to admit a machined pin. I've seen that footprint in more than one hobbyist-made board, so it must be in a default library somewhere. Also, the footprint for the provided 2.1mm DC power jack assumes you have really, really tiny pins on your jack. I even went to the trouble to purchase the jack named in the parts library and it *still* didn't fit - had to ream out all the holes on the final board. For through-hole resistors and caps, for 14 and 16-pin DIPs, momentary switches, etc., I've not had a hole or pad problem with Eagle. It's just a few parts, but when it happens, it is maddening. As for the "blue wire" problem - I happened to have made a mistake on my last board that I would have liked the ERC or DRC catch - I accidentally named two elements of the same bus the same (D7 twice, no D5). Because only one or two pins of that bus happened to go somewhere, it wasn't an obvious problem visually. Yes, I should have caught it while inspecting the design, but I didn't. Fortunately, I could change the firmware to work around the bug (or I could do a cut-and-jump). More fortunately, once the problem was identified, it took less than 5 min to fix it on both the schematic and the layout. I remember such problems back in the day with OrCAD and PADS and how much one had to rip-up to fix layout mistakes. I'm happy things are much easier to correct with modern tools. I'm not going to defend Eagle, but I'm unfamiliar with diptrace - what makes it better? I use Eagle because it works on any computer I'm likely to be sitting and and because there are lots of examples and user-contributed parts. I'm not opposed to switching tools, but I'd rather not switch tools just to spend all my time creating libraries for classic computer components. If another tool has better libraries and is easier to use, then I'm all for it. -ethan

Alexandre Souza - Listas wrote: I have the older version of diptrace. I am not so happy with it. No PLCC sockets of any kind. No support for TUBES of any kind. All the new libraries have more surface mount junk. Manual routing is a pain. Auto routing does work no more than 3 chips for a two layer board.

I have a clean working PDP-11/03 with two RL01s I?d like to trade for a working paper tape reader/punch and interface for my 11/20, or failing that will sell for $500. CPU is in a nice OEM cabinet with attached work surface. Powers up, and I can read/write memory from a console. I have no media for the RL01s and haven?t attempted to boot any OS. Cards in the CPU include: M8043 DLVJ1-M Q 4-Line Asynchronous Interface (formerly DLV11-J) M8043 DLVJ1-M Q 4-Line Asynchronous Interface (formerly DLV11-J) M7940 DLV11 Q Serial Line Unit (SLU, Async) M8013 RLV11 Q RL01 disk controller, 1 of 2 M8014 RLV11 Q RL01 bus controller, 2 of 2 M8044-DE MSV11-DD Q 32-Kword 16-bit MOS RAM KM7270 KD11-HA Q LSI-11/2 CPU, 16-bit Both RL-01s (Model 70-12130) power up, but have no media. You can see pictures at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/49228694 at N06/ Local pick-up only from zipcode 94025. Lee Courtney lee_courtney at acm.org 650-704-3934

I have a boatload of RL01 disk packs and would mind getting rid of some. There is a problem though. One of the packs probably contains GAMMA-11, which I need, and I don't know which one and have limited ability of finding it. But it can be done if someone wants disk packs badly. /P

On 4/13/2010 4:56 PM, Steven Hirsch wrote: I wonder if this Z80 CP/M in the IndusGT for CBM was ever available. Jim -- Jim Brain, Brain Innovations (X) brain at jbrain.com Dabbling in WWW, Embedded Systems, Old CBM computers, and Good Times! Home: http://www.jbrain.com

On 4/13/10 2:58 PM, "Steven Hirsch" <snhirsch at gmail.com> wrote: Yes, uses 1/2 of a 628128. :) I have a good supply of the boards, I got 25 of them :)