> I'll bet the inhabitants of this list could
cook up a better product
almost overnight.
What a dumb comment. How can you compare a glossy fanboy gamer magazine to
an academic journal?
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of Michael Kerpan
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:18 PM
To: cctalk at
classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Annals of the History of Computing: "bitsavers" is referenced
Ye gads... If that's the leading publication on Computer History, it looks
like the market could stand another. Something more along the lines of the
excellent UK magazine "Retro Gamer" perhaps, with articles written by (and
for) normal (if a bit fannish) humans and lots of pictures of old hardware
and stuff. You could call it "Classic Bits" or something actually catchy.
I'll bet the inhabitants of this list could cook up a better product almost
overnight.
Mike