No, epic fail. Separately, I can't figure out for the life of me how some posts are getting a cc to "general at classiccmp.org" which does not exist. -----Original Message----- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Dave Woyciesjes Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 9:03 AM To: General at classiccmp.org; Discussion at classiccmp.org:On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: test On 11/13/2014 11:27 PM, Jay West wrote: Did you pass? -- --- Dave Woyciesjes --- CompTIA A+ Certified IT Tech - http://certification.comptia.org/ --- HDI Certified Support Center Analyst - http://www.ThinkHDI.com/ Registered Linux user number 464583 "Computers have lots of memory but no imagination." "The problem with troubleshooting is that trouble shoots back." - from some guy on the internet.

I have been getting emails sent to me from the list by people who are getting my reply to. I send my email out to an ISP mail server for outbound here at my house (TWC ISP) So to get stuff back at my preferred email address, I have thunderbird and any other configured email client set to add a "reply-to" to my actual mail domain email, not back to TWC. In fact I don't know if someone can find my TWC email address from an email. Anyway, I have always gotten various emails on my google account which for some reason fail a rule to have either cctalk or cctech in the from field. And now I'm getting emails for the list directly to my return-to email address, which is whitelisted. I suspect this email is showing up in the archived emails too, but have not checked the site to see what is there in the archives. I'd prefer not to have my return-to header on any archive site for obvious reasons. Maybe all emails are obfuscated there, have not looked. Anyway, thought I'd throw that out there while there are eyes on the problem. I don't know if Jay or Lawrence (who I know moderates) is who to send an email to for examination / tracing, or if that is not a problem you guys will bother to work on. It only annoys me because I do whitelisting rather than spam filtering, and am not anxious to have whitelist addresses get out when I can help it. Thanks as always. Jim On 11/14/2014 7:31 AM, Jay West wrote: