22 Dec
2004
22 Dec
'04
2:11 p.m.
We're all wrong! Tantalums don't "fail" -- that's not zero-ohms
you measure across the two mangled pins -- it's INFINITE
CAPACITANCE!
I estimate my little 47uF/35VDC tant must now be, oh, a TF
or more (teraFarad). Of course it blows the 5amp fuse in the
power supply! The TC is measured in YEARS...
There's no other explanation possible.
None.
I am not listening to you.
22 Dec
22 Dec
2:13 p.m.
Tom Jennings wrote:
We're all wrong! Tantalums don't
"fail" -- that's not zero-ohms
you measure across the two mangled pins -- it's INFINITE
CAPACITANCE!
I estimate my little 47uF/35VDC tant must now be, oh, a TF
or more (teraFarad). Of course it blows the 5amp fuse in the
power supply! The TC is measured in YEARS...
There's no other explanation possible.
You got a FLUX Capacitor by mistake and you need several terra-watts
of power for temporial displacment back to 1980. :)
2:32 p.m.
New subject: Cold Fusion, Infinite Capacitors, and other Suppressed Technologies... -- plus reason for DOUBLED MESSAGES
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Ben Franchuk wrote:
You got a FLUX Capacitor by mistake and you need
several terra-watts
of power for temporial displacment back to 1980. :)
I think I SAID I'm not listening to you! :-)
Actually, this was #2 of 2 posts; the other did not make
it. Here's what mail MTA says:
-Queue ID- --Size-- ----Arrival Time---- -Sender/Recipient-------
1D8DC2D57A 2414 Wed Dec 22 17:06:57 tomj(a)wps.com
(conversation with mail.ezwind.net[209.145.140.19] timed out while sending
end of data -- message may be sent more than once)
cctech(a)classiccmp.org
AHA! This may explain the doubling of CC mail -- someone's
incoming MTA is a crock. The receiving MTA is probably ending
the connection before it completes SMTP gunk.
Or, it's one of those flux capacitors sending the mail back
in time.
7126
days inactive
7126
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
bfranchuk＠jetnet.ab.ca -
eric＠brouhaha.com -
tomj＠wps.com