Does anybody know more about this accelerator? What
kind of
performance does it yield compared to, say, one of the later
Quadras? Are there basic differences in the I/O and bus
architecture that will prevent the 68040 from reaching its
full potential on a Mac II mainboard as opposed to a 68040
in a Quadra? Do Quadras have faster SCSI?
Don't know about the accelerator, Daystar is either out of
the Mac business altogether, or at least not making accelerators
anymore; Sonnet resells some Daystar stuff; a web search should
yield more info.
Quadras vary significantly in their apparant speeds; we've had
Quadra 605s (an LC-II class machine, 16 or 25MHz 040 sans FPU),
Quadra 700s (Mac IIci form factor, 25MHz 040 w/FPU), Quadra 650s
(33MHz 040 w/FPU), Quadra 800s (80MHz 040/40MHz bus w/FPU) and
the similar Quadra 840AV which has two SCSI busses (busi?) using
a different chipset or on-board acrchitecture.
But as a comparison, on some tasks, the 25MHz 700s are as fast
as the 33MHz 650s; on other tasks, the 650s were faster.
I have a Mac IIci at home with the Radius Rocket installed
(mine is the 33MHz version). Different accelerator (the
rocket has its own RAM and plugs into a NuBus slot); it is
definitely not as fast as a Q650, and maybe not even as fast
as the Q700. However, software was available called Rocketshare
which made it possible to run the Mac in sort of an SMP mode.
Also, the machine has two floppy drives; how do the
Mac II
drives rank among those found in Apple machines in terms of
usefulness/durability?
The earlier 800k floppy drives weren't Superdrives (actually
standard 1.44/2.0MB floppies), IIRC; I think the Mac IIci was
the first with those. Not sure if a retrofit is possible.
Mac owners tend to have been less sophisticated, and either
never cleaned their floppy drives, or cleaned them wrongly;
however, I've seen few that totally quit working. They usually
just refuse to read floppies written on drives other than
themselves.
regards,
-dq