7 Sep
1999
7 Sep
'99
9:02 p.m.
desktop. Despite the claims of Apple and the Palo Alto
connection
and the suit that wound up GEM on PCs and resulted in Windblows,
I am unclear as to what the DI relationship was, why Atari was
allowed to continue with it's GEM desktop, altho they stopped at
I'm confused. I had assumed that GEM was simply renamed to Viewmax which was
bundled with DR Dos. If there's differences I didn't spot them.
Hans Olminkhof
10 Sep
10 Sep
5:40 a.m.
>desktop. Despite the claims of Apple and the Palo
Alto connection
>and the suit that wound up GEM on PCs and resulted in Windblows,
>I am unclear as to what the DI relationship was, why Atari was
>allowed to continue with it's GEM desktop, altho they stopped at
I'm confused. I had assumed that GEM was simply
renamed to Viewmax which was
bundled with DR Dos. If there's differences I didn't spot them.
ViewMax was just a fast hit to compete against the DOS-Shell.
Jep, it was almost a full GEM, but not intended to be - but
it needs only som minor changes :)
Gruss
H.
--
Stimm gegen SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/de/
Vote against SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/en/
Votez contre le SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/fr/
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
9236
days inactive
9238
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Hans.Franke＠mch20.sbs.de -
jolminkh＠nsw.bigpond.net.au