17 Nov
2005
17 Nov
'05
1:34 a.m.
Subject: Re: DEC "Junk" rescued
From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:29:03 +0000 (GMT)
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
What about the 11/34m 11/44, 11/60!
Funny thing about PDP-11 system models. Even
number for the most part
are unibus like 11/34 or 11/44 (11/05, 11/35 exception) and odd number
like 11/03, 11/23 are qbus.
I thought all machines ending in 5 (05, 35, 45, 55) were Unibus. From what
I've read (and I've seen a manual with a sketch of one), there
were going
to be 11/09 and 11/39 machines. These would have been
'packaged' versions of the 11/04 and 11/34 (much as the 11/10 is a
packaged version of the 11/05). In the end, I don't think DEC ever
shipped a machien with that nameplate, they were all marked 11/04 or
11/34 as appropriate.
-tony 
17 Nov
17 Nov
8:45 p.m.
Subject: Re: DEC "Junk" rescued
From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:29:03 +0000 (GMT)
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
What about the 11/34m 11/44, 11/60! Funny thing about PDP-11 system models. Even
number for the most part
are unibus like 11/34 or 11/44 (11/05, 11/35 exception) and odd number
like 11/03, 11/23 are qbus.
I thought all machines ending in 5 (05, 35, 45, 55) were Unibus. From what
I've read (and I've seen a manual with a sketch of one), there
were going
to be 11/09 and 11/39 machines. These would have been
'packaged' versions of the 11/04 and 11/34 (much as the 11/10 is a
packaged version of the 11/05). In the end, I don't think DEC ever
shipped a machien with that nameplate, they were all marked 11/04 or
11/34 as appropriate.
-tony
6991
days inactive
6991
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
ajp166＠bellatlantic.net -
ard＠p850ug1.demon.co.uk