Guy, this is fantastic news! I have previously speculated about doing this, but it's still on the 'someday' list. They should. DEC made the same basic part, but using 3x40-pin cables: M9042 (half-length, knuckle-buster) and M9014 (full-length). Apparently the characteristic impedance of N-pin flat cable is close enough to the BC11 cable that it works. Speaking of M9014's, though, the board list describes them as "UNIBUS to 3 H854s", and also lists an M9015, described as "3 H854s to UNIBUS". Does anyone know what the difference is between the two? Unlike the QBUS, the UNIBUS shouldn't need two different kinds of board, since the 'grant in' pin on one end of a UNIBUS cable is the same as the 'grant out' pin on the other end (unlike the QBUS, where the pinout is designed to support plugging in boards, so there are separate 'grant in' and 'grant out' pins). I can't for the life of me think of anything about the UNIBUS that a straight through-connect wouldn't handle - i.e. a pair of M9014's, on each end of the cable set. Certainly, BC11 cables ends aren't marked 'in' and 'out'! ;-) So does anyone know why the M9015 exists - what it different about it, etc, etc? Or was someone at DEC just not thinking hard enough when they spec'd it? Heh, they'll still be cheaper than actual BC11's! :-) Noel