On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Witchy wrote: Perhaps you should unset your Reply-To address in the configuration. The headers should sort themselves out without the need to explicitly state where the replies should go. I'm just guessing here, but it sounds logical. Doubtful. Your messages are among the very, very few where I have this problem (there is only one other person with the same problem but I can't remember who). -- Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org [ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ] [ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]

Bearing in mind a lot of mailing software ignores the 'from' field and instead uses the 'reply-to' field instead. Well, OK, for USENET anyway :) Like I say, this problem only started happening with the last list-upgrade. I've change nothing before or since. Jay, are you out there? *shudder* I have a big enough problem having to run Gatesware on this machine as it is, never mind letting some shoddily-coded outsider manipulate my settings! :) If I could be arsed to work out how to install winduhs 2000 manually I would, just so I could understand what horrors it goes through, though that would probably shoo me away. I know Dreamweaver has its brickbats but it's only that and Photoshop that keeps me running this unreliable shite. Oh, and I've got several years' worth of past museum mails etc that are in Outlook format so I need Outlook, unless there's an open source app that's happy with .PST files....... I just want to know why my posts end up as coming from me AND the list. I'm not doing it deliberately and I know it happens to others. I'm just so used to hitting 'reply to all' and deleting the addresses I don't need so stuff goes straight to the list. cheers -- Adrian/Witchy www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - possibly the UK's biggest online computer museum www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk - ex-monthly gothic shenanigans :o(

On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 00:54, Witchy wrote: list upgrades can do funny things... :) just checking :) I just dual-boot my main desktop, linux and win2k. I only use 2k for paint shop pro work (photoshop drives me nuts - way too bloated for its own good!) and for audio sample editing (I haven't found a decent sample editor for linux) let me know if you find anything, and I'll do likewise - I'm in the same situation. I'm just about to upgrade Evolution to see what import formats it has, plus I need to look at what (if any) export options outlook has (none, knowing MS). If I can get mails from outlook in plain text format, I can script something that'll produce a unix-style mbox format and I know Evolution will import that. Luckily I don't need to refer to the old emails that often, but it's a pain having to reboot when I do - it'd also be nice to get all the old mail onto the server so that everything's in one place :) Looks like it is just that Reply-to field; your mail software adds it whenever you send email and nobody elses does. The list software is then a little broken (IMHO) in that when it receives mail it doesn't replace an exisiting Reply-to but simply appends to it before distributing to list members. What mail server do you use? I suppose it's not impossible that your ISP is adding the field, although that would seem like a very bad thing to be doing. Setting up a different piece of mail software and seeing what that does, or even telnetting to your mail server and sending manually to see what happens might be a good test. I checked and the Reply-to field is appearing in private emails that you've sent to me, so sending to anyone you know and getting them to look at the headers would be a fair test I reckon. cheers Jules

I pulled it from a Televideo 910 terminal logic board. It is a 40 pin DIP with no other markings except a 1983 date code. Also, this chip is NOT in the manual for the TVI 910 on the page describing the board components. It seems that my (actually 2) terminal logic boards are later versions than what is described in the manual. The manual has no mention of the 2057400 chip but my terminals both use it. My problem, other than having no idea what the IC does, is that I have only one chip. Both terminals work. Eric

On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Witchy wrote: Guess what? IT WORKED! Hooray. -- Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org [ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ] [ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]

If you cannot find it, let me know. I was told of something that will turn outlook into mbox format, but I've long since forgotten what it was. If it turns out not to have been Evolution (which it probably was), I'll ask the person who told me in the first place and pass the answer along. Antonio -- --------------- Antonio Carlini arcarlini(a)iee.org