On Sep 7, 2018, at 8:46 AM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
From: Paul Koning
inside are a whole pile of boards, all
single-sided etch with many
hundreds of jumpers to compensate for not being two-sided. Not cheap,
presumably
If memory serves, didn't the VT52 also have single-sided boards with a whole
bunch of jumper wires? Something relatively common, anyway, if not the VT52 -
I clearly remember the masses of jumpers on something, and Tech Sq had scads
of VT52's (to the point where VT100's were not that common when they did show
up, we were already full up).
Presumably, with automated placing machines, the jumpers were cheaper than a
large double-sided board (the VT52's boards were huge)? I'm assuming _someone_
did the math (including the amortization of the placing machine, which would
take longer to complete such a board).
I don't remember the VT52 board, but you may well be right. The obvious advantage of
single sided boards is that it avoids plated through holes. I once did a two-sided board
without plated through holes (at the U of Illinois -- the board shop didn't know how)
but that wasn't reasonable technology for serious work because you have to solder both
sides then.
The VT61/t stood out to me because it has so much stuff in it. I forgot how many boards,
but it was way more than the VT52 (which has just one, I think). No surprise, the VT61/t
has local editing / forms processing capability with block mode transmission both ways.
In one Typeset-11 application you'd edit a screen full of text locally and send it
back when done; in the other you'd fill in a classified ad order form and send that.
The VT71 also had local text editing but there it's a whole file, with local scrolling
and search, line wrap, and macros ("User Defined Keys", UDK, tied to a row of
blank keycaps that the customer would label).
paul