On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Chuck Guzis wrote:
Micropolis 1016-2 likewise are belt drive, but with a
leadscrew
positioner--they're slow, but indestructible, if the drive belt
holds.
With a new belt now and then, the Micropolis will outlast all of us.
Drives I don't like: Qume 142
slow, and the
second most unreliable that I've used (after the BASF 2/3
height)
Shugart SA-450.
I've had excellent luck with
Shugart 455s, which seems to be the same
drive as Panasonic and Matsushita.
Note that many older drives will require more power,
if that's an
issue for you.
I learned early on that the drives don't have to be on the same
power
supply as the motherboard.
Teac FD-55Bxxx's are okay; . . .
I've used others; but they didn't make enough of an impression to
stick around. If you're going to use hard-sector diskettes from time
to time, make sure that your drive will work with them. Some later-
model (for 360K, that is) drives will wait until a "drive ready"
condition exists (i.e., the spindle is at speed) before gating the
read signal to the host.
Teac is one of the ones where masking off the index must
be done in the
cable, not by covering the hole in the disk jacket. In addition to hard
sectored, that is an issue with Cromemco, some Kaypros, etc. (The 10x512
short gap problem)