Sorry to hear one of the first deals went bad. Or was
that comment a
dig at someone we know? How have the other auctions been doing?
No one on this list, I think - I pointed the deal out because a -1
feedback is a black eye.
Anyway, some email problems killed communications for a few days after
the auction ended, so this jerk concluded that we killed the deal off and
put up more fibre. Six days is a very short time to jump to a conclusion,
but this guy did and gave us bad feedback.
We are doing well with the auctions - mostly non-vintage stuff like
ethernet things and fibre. We have a few cool things coming up soon, like
a Apples III and IIGS (Woz edition), a Commodore PET of some sort,
probably some old workstation stuff, maybe a few other bits a pieces. And
fibre...lots of fibre.
Perhaps someone hired to perform this task would pay
for their salary
and more?
Maybe someone hired on a commission basis?
If we had five figures of things to move, that would be an idea, but for
our volume it is not reasonable.
we have much more in common with the antique radio
collectors than with
collectors of Beanie Babies. The point I am trying to make is that all
we have to do is observe where the Antique Radio Collector field is
today
and how it got there. We are following the same path. We can take
shortcuts
and avoid pitfalls. Vintage computer collecting is not a fad, vintage
computers
are not Star Wars figures.
Even Star Wars figure and Beanie Baby collecting has gone thru the same
motions - it really is just a natural evolution.
However, an IVCA, with elected officers, bylaws, dues,
and
non-profit
status would be a great boost to this collecting field.
It is a great idea, but I think we do not have critical mass. We also
don't have someone that is willing to be the editor of a newsletter.
However, I'm not aware of
any
_major_ Vintage Computer Newsletters (virtual or otherwise)
CHAC had a good one, but it seems that organization is in a holding pattern.
goal, if I understand it correctly, is the
preservation of our computer
technology
for posterity. If an organized association greatly furthers this cause
than I
believe we should be focusing in that direction. And I'm not limiting
"we" to mean
just those on this list, but also those on the many other
vintage/classic hardware
and software lists as well.
I am a proponent of the museum system (uhh...obviously, I guess), so I
tend to preach in that direction:
I think that the best way to grow the hobby into something serious is to
form regional organizations. RCS/RI is one of them - we grew out of a few
guys in Providence, RI, that were interested in older systems. We have
grown a little in number, but we have collected a whole big bunch of
machines, software, and documentation. Most of what we have was only
saved because we were able to pull together as a group, sharing expenses
to get or ship the equipment, and to pay for the rent for our space. The
machines are basically community owned, so if a member leaves for any
reason, the collection remains basically intact (there are a few machines
in the collection that are privately owned).
We have long term plans - things like newsletters, shows, a real
exhibition hall, etc.. I think we will actually hit some our goals as
well, as we do have a number of dedicated people.
I would urge just about everyone on this list to look into joining or
forming a group. The rewards are great. Rhode Island, that little state
tucked away on the East, has two groups, RCS/RI and RICM. The West Coast
has the Computer History Center (I bet they wouldn't mind a few
volunteers). I am quite suprised that the DC area is lacking any group, as
it seems to be a hotbed of vintage computing. The same strikes me about
the Midwest (Chicago) as well.
William Donzelli
aw288(a)osfn.org