No. Thicknet used N connectors. It was (as someone else pointed out) not the one that used BNC connectors (That's thinnet or 10Base-2) nor Tees (Also 10Base-2). It was (is-- I still have a spool of it!) 50 ohm coax with N connectors, and paint marks at every meter boundary. You had to terminate each run of thicknet end each end (that's two ends, for those who are counting). You had to tap it with a vampire tap ONLY ON THE 1 METER MARKS using a tap drill tool that would core into the shield and expose the center conductor. You had to be very careful not to nick the center conductor too much, or you would cause an impedance "bump" at that point, and partial reflections. You also had to use a good tap tool, not a cheapo, so as to make clean holes, because god help you if you got stray braid in the hole and shorted it. With the tap in place, a transceiver was bolted to it, usually I used Cabletron, Lantronix, or DEC. Then you carefully made sure the "heartbeat" switch was OFF, plugged in a 15-pin AUI ("DIX" = DEC Intel Xerox, I think) cable, which ran to a concentrator of some kind. We were using DEC DEQNA or DEMPR products, as I recall. One of them fanned out into a large number of thinnet runs. I'm still looking for specs on thicknet cable-- I know the characteristic impedance is 50 ohms, but if I knew the velocity factor and losses at VHF (144 - 148 mhz) and UHF (430 - 450 MHz) I could use the stuff for my amateur radio hobby. As it is, it's gathering dust. HTH, Tom At 01:16 PM 3/31/2005 -0500, you wrote: [Aging] No woman should ever be quite accurate about her age. It looks so calculating. --Oscar Wilde --... ...-- -.. . -. ----. --.- --.- -... tpeters at nospam.mixcom.com (remove "nospam") N9QQB (amateur radio) "HEY YOU" (loud shouting) WEB ADDRESS http//www.mixweb.com/tpeters 43? 7' 17.2" N by 88? 6' 28.9" W, Elevation 815', Grid Square EN53wc WAN/LAN/Telcom Analyst, Tech Writer, MCP, CCNA, Registered Linux User 385531