Good comments.
Why not think of a museum as a (somewhat ordered) collection of real
objects that may be publicly viewed in one fashion or another ?
Phenomenology notwithstanding, the existence of a museum does not depend
upon my physical presence within.
Steve
jim s wrote:
On 1/22/2010 10:25 AM, Rob Jarratt wrote:
My dictionary says a museum is "A building
used for storing and
exhibition
of objects...". Not much exhibiting going on in this "museum". I think a
museum is only a museum if the public can go there and see the physical
objects. I don't think a web site can be a museum, unless the
"objects" are
software or other purely digital artefacts.
Regards
Rob
I know of a number of people who have collections such as this that
refer to them as a museum.
I don't think the fact that you have to know them, or arrange for
admission by appointment with them
to view the artifacts is a problem that makes the term incorrect here.
And as pointed out elsewhere in the thread, the artifact information
is actually available on a website,
which is more than I can say for a lot of museums. Many art
collections are this way as are collections
of antiquarian books, the latter which I guess could be called a library.
Each collector has their own perspective on what is unique about their
collection, and whether it is
rare, and what the significance is vs. just a random selection of parts.
As to the definition above, I do not know that that "exhibition" means
that the public can just walk in.
One is required to purchase a ticket to most museums now, and knowing
the person with the collection
is not a lot different of a restriction than having to buy a ticket.