30 Aug
2006
30 Aug
'06
10:02 a.m.
I've never seen this list like this, with SO BLOODY MUCH discussion about the
list itself, far in excess of the stuff that (I thought) this list was
supposed to be about.
I've seen a number of folks saying "If you don't like the way this list is
run, start your own", so I did -- but not for that reason. I started a
yahoo group for folks to discuss the 10-year-rule and the similar stuff
that's been bogging things down in here lately. You can join it at:
10-year-rule-subscribe at yahoogroups.com
Feel free, and have fun.
Now, can we get back to talking about classic computers (by whatever
definition)?
--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
M Dakin
30 Aug
30 Aug
1:15 p.m.
Roy wrote....
I started a
yahoo group for folks to discuss the 10-year-rule and the similar stuff
that's been bogging things down in here lately. You can join it at:
10-year-rule-subscribe at yahoogroups.com
Feel free, and have fun.
Now, can we get back to talking about classic computers (by whatever
definition)?
I know it's the "10 year rule" list, but I was wondering about an RSS feed
for it. And please, please put a tag in the subject line of all posts like
[10-year-rule] so I know what messages are what. And make damn sure the
reply-to address for your list is not the original poster, cause I don't
believe in RFC's and that ilk. Or is all that kinda stuff considered
off-topic? So just what IS on topic on your list? I'm really hoping we can
post more on the topic of what is on topic than the real topic of the list.
I'm sure that's ok.
ha ha
J
1:51 p.m.
Roy wrote....
I started a yahoo group for folks to discuss the
10-year-rule and the
similar stuff
that's been bogging things down in here lately.
You can join it at:
10-year-rule-subscribe at yahoogroups.com
Feel free, and have fun.
Are you using just 365 day years or are you including 366 day (leap) years?
Or are you simply defining a year as 365.25 days?
:)
1:55 p.m.
--- Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
Roy wrote....
LOL LOL
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
I started a yahoo group for folks to discuss the
10-year-rule and the
similar stuff
that's been bogging things down in here
lately.
You can join it at:
10-year-rule-subscribe at yahoogroups.com
Feel free, and have fun.
Are you using just 365 day years or are you
including 366 day (leap) years?
Or are you simply defining a year as 365.25 days?
:)
2:06 p.m.
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 04:51 pm, Chuck Guzis wrote:
Roy wrote....
I dunno, take it up over there and see what shakes out... :-)
--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
M Dakin
I started a yahoo group for folks to discuss the
10-year-rule and the
similar stuff that's been bogging things down in here lately. You can
join it at: 10-year-rule-subscribe at yahoogroups.com
Feel free, and have fun.
Are you using just 365 day years or are you including 366 day (leap) years?
Or are you simply defining a year as 365.25 days?
:) 
3:47 p.m.
Chuck Guzis wrote:
Roy wrote....
What about equipment such as the AGC and other such space-borne
computing machinery? Out there, you just don't have years...
Gordon.
I started a yahoo group for folks to discuss the
10-year-rule and the
similar stuff
that's been bogging things down in here
lately. You can join it at:
10-year-rule-subscribe at yahoogroups.com
Feel free, and have fun.
Are you using just 365 day years or are you including 366 day (leap) years?
Or are you simply defining a year as 365.25 days?
6:07 p.m.
New subject: OT: new list
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Chuck Guzis wrote:
Are you using just 365 day years or are you including
366 day (leap) years?
Or are you simply defining a year as 365.25 days?
365.24219 (approximately)
We recently had the 25th anniversary of the IBM 5150 PC,
the machine that heralded the end of the classic era.
Yes, there were some classics produced after the introduction
of the PC, it signified the end, not immediately cutting it off.
2 p.m.
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 04:15 pm, Jay West wrote:
Roy wrote....
I'll fiddle with it when I get some time and see what can be done...
--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
M Dakin
I started a yahoo group for folks to discuss the
10-year-rule and the
similar stuff that's been bogging things down in here lately. You can
join it at:
10-year-rule-subscribe at yahoogroups.com
Feel free, and have fun.
Now, can we get back to talking about classic computers (by whatever
definition)?
I know it's the "10 year rule" list, but I was wondering about an RSS feed
for it. And please, please put a tag in the subject line of all posts like
[10-year-rule] so I know what messages are what. And make damn sure the
reply-to address for your list is not the original poster, cause I don't
believe in RFC's and that ilk. Or is all that kinda stuff considered
off-topic? So just what IS on topic on your list? I'm really hoping we can
post more on the topic of what is on topic than the real topic of the list.
I'm sure that's ok.
ha ha
J
6689
days inactive
6689
days old
7 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
cclist＠sydex.com -
chrism3667＠yahoo.com -
cisin＠xenosoft.com -
gordon＠gjcp.net -
jwest＠classiccmp.org -
rtellason＠verizon.net