17 Nov
2005
17 Nov
'05
1:42 p.m.
Hi,
As I recall, the 11/05, 11/15, 11/35 and maybe 11/45 were what DEC referred
to as the "OEM" versions of the 11/10, 11/20, 11/40, and 11/50.
Paul
17 Nov
17 Nov
1:50 p.m.
The 11/15 is where that started, not 11/05, but otherwise I think you're
right.
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of Useddec at aol.com
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 3:42 PM
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: DEC "Junk" rescued
Hi,
As I recall, the 11/05, 11/15, 11/35 and maybe 11/45 were what DEC
referred
to as the "OEM" versions of the 11/10, 11/20, 11/40, and 11/50.
Paul
2:07 p.m.
>>>> "Julian" == Julian Wolfe
<fireflyst at earthlink.net> writes:
Julian> The 11/15 is where that started, not 11/05, but otherwise I
Julian> think you're right.
> As I recall, the 11/05, 11/15, 11/35 and maybe
11/45 were what DEC
> referred to as the "OEM" versions of the 11/10, 11/20, 11/40, and
> 11/50.
Yes, the 11/15 did it first since it was the 11/20 relabeled. And the
11/05 is another example. But the 11/45 is not. I don't even
remember the designation 11/50; certainly the 11/45 was a regular end
user system.
There isn't any 11/50 mentioned in the PDP-11 Architecture Handbook.
(Then again, neither is the 11/55, and that designation is real,
though not particularly common. And it isn't an OEM 11/60, but rather
a bipolar memory version of the 11/45.)
paul
6981
days inactive
6981
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
fireflyst＠earthlink.net -
pkoning＠equallogic.com -
Useddec＠aol.com