***This should've went out yesterday. Seems like a small "problem" between the way Win/Outlook and D/UX3.2/Netscape handle the Reply-To (or is it Sender) field in a message..**** ! From: Bob Bramwell [mailto:bob@copenhagen.cuug.ab.ca] ! ! Sure is quiet, isn't it? But I'm listening, and this can ! serve as a test of my ! ability to submit to the list by the simple expedient of ! hitting "reply" in my ! mailer window. Yeah, cctech is kinda quiet, but I believe that has to do with the whole moderation thing, and discussions branching off once they get re-posted to cctalk. I'm currently subscribed to both. I have rules in place to send messages from each list to separate folders. That way, depending on my mood, and workload, I can follow the wandering discussion on cctalk, or just read whatever meat comes through on cctech. --- David A Woyciesjes --- C & IS Support Specialist --- Yale University Press --- (203) 432-0953 --- ICQ # - 905818 Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash _______________________________________________ cctech mailing list cctech(a)classiccmp.org http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctech