10 Apr
1998
10 Apr
'98
12:15 p.m.
This is a Star Trek question and has absolutely no place on this
discussion.
<snip>
On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Hotze wrote:
<snip>
> microscopic. Furthermore, in some episodes, they
find Chodak and T'Kon
> ruins, between 900,000 to 700,000 years old, with half or more of the
data
> intact.
I think 700,000 years old qualifies as being over the ten year mark :-)
-- Kirk
10 Apr
10 Apr
12:37 p.m.
kroma wrote:
And it just might start some interesting information about things that
have been tried in the past and dropped for whatever reason. Like
'mechanical delay lines' (water tube and/or mercury tube).
Chuck
This is a Star Trek question and has absolutely no place on this
discussion.
<snip>
On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Hotze wrote:
<snip>
> microscopic. Furthermore, in some episodes,
they find Chodak and T'Kon
> ruins, between 900,000 to 700,000 years old, with half or more of the
data
> intact.
I think 700,000 years old qualifies as being over the ten year mark :-)
-- Kirk
9830
days inactive
9830
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
cad＠gamewood.net -
kroma＠worldnet.att.net