In the past I have tried to write code to paper and failed to do much with
it. Outlines are about as far as I can go. I did this because I wanted to
continue work or pass the time when I didn't have a machine in front of me
(in high-school or waiting in the Doctor's office).
Having a machine to interact with allows you to test your code on the spot
and if you are writing in an interpreted language the error-checking the
interpreter provides is a godsend for the coder. Why anyone would code
without the interaction of the target machine is beyond me.
In <20000616221304.ZBJD2991.mailhost.kal.ameritech.net@paulrsm>, on
06/17/00
at 02:27 AM, "Paul R. Santa-Maria" <paulrsm(a)ameritech.net> said:
----------
> From: Douglas Quebbeman <dhquebbeman(a)theestopinalgroup.com>
> To: 'classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org'
> Subject: RE: Apple III motherboard
> Date: Friday, June 16, 2000 01:39 PM
>
> Since I compose
> to paper (and still do and cannot understand why some
> programmers compose directly into thr machine),
Because I can type much faster than I can write.
Paul R. Santa-Maria
Ann Arbor, Michigan USA
paulrsm(a)ameritech.net
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
technoid(a)cheta.net
-----------------------------------------------------------