10 Jan
2014
10 Jan
'14
12:39 p.m.
From the Digibarn site, feel free to answer...
Your Name: Dave Tumey
Your Email address: davetumey at yahoo.com
1. Include comment in Site
2. Include name with comment
3. Include email address
Comment was:
-----------
I am rebuilding the RTTY station I had as a teenager and I am trying
to get my hands on an ASR-33 Teletype. Even though they built some
600,000+ machines, I am finding it quite difficult to track one
down. I am looking for a machine with EXCELLENT cosmetics - it does
not need to work - that can be fixed. For a machine in excellent
condition, I would be willing to pay a king's ransom. So...if you
know anyone who might have a machine that is in need of being
utilized, please let me know, it would be greatly appreicated. --dave
10 Jan
10 Jan
2:25 p.m.
On 01/10/2014 12:39 PM, Bruce Damer wrote:
> I am rebuilding the RTTY station I had as a
teenager and I am trying
> to get my hands on an ASR-33 Teletype. Even though they built some
> 600,000+ machines, I am finding it quite difficult to track one down.
> I am looking for a machine with EXCELLENT cosmetics - it does not need
> to work - that can be fixed. For a machine in excellent condition, I
> would be willing to pay a king's ransom. So...if you know anyone who
> might have a machine that is in need of being utilized, please let me
> know, it would be greatly appreicated. --dave
I thought that RTTY used Murray code (e.g. ASR-32) not ASCII.
Or am I horribly out of date?
--Chuck
2:36 p.m.
On Jan 10, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
On 01/10/2014 12:39 PM, Bruce Damer wrote:
Murray (?Baudot?) code is the classic, but ASCII has also been used since the 1960s or so.
paul, ni1d
> I am rebuilding the RTTY station I had as a
teenager and I am trying
> to get my hands on an ASR-33 Teletype. Even though they built some
> 600,000+ machines, I am finding it quite difficult to track one down.
> I am looking for a machine with EXCELLENT cosmetics - it does not need
> to work - that can be fixed. For a machine in excellent condition, I
> would be willing to pay a king's ransom. So...if you know anyone who
> might have a machine that is in need of being utilized, please let me
> know, it would be greatly appreicated. --dave
I thought that RTTY used Murray code (e.g. ASR-32) not ASCII.
Or am I horribly out of date?
?Chuck 
11 Jan
11 Jan
2:35 p.m.
On 1/10/14 2:36 PM, "Paul Koning" <paulkoning at comcast.net> wrote:
On Jan 10, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
Hm, I got my first license in 1972, and five-level Baudot was still the
standard then, ISTR. Most folks were using things like Model 28s.
-- Ian King K7PDP
On 01/10/2014 12:39 PM, Bruce Damer wrote:
Murray (?Baudot?) code is the classic, but ASCII has also been used since
the 1960s or so.
paul, ni1d
> I am rebuilding the RTTY station I had as a
teenager and I am trying
> to get my hands on an ASR-33 Teletype. Even though they built some
> 600,000+ machines, I am finding it quite difficult to track one down.
> I am looking for a machine with EXCELLENT cosmetics - it does not need
> to work - that can be fixed. For a machine in excellent condition, I
> would be willing to pay a king's ransom. So...if you know anyone who
> might have a machine that is in need of being utilized, please let me
> know, it would be greatly appreicated. --dave
I thought that RTTY used Murray code (e.g. ASR-32) not ASCII.
Or am I horribly out of date?
?Chuck
4:07 p.m.
On Jan 11, 2014, at 5:35 PM, Ian King <IanK at LivingComputerMuseum.org> wrote:
On 1/10/14 2:36 PM, "Paul Koning"
<paulkoning at comcast.net> wrote:
That sounds right. As far as I know (from reading; I wasn?t active in this area) ham
radio RTTY was always mostly 5-level code (still may be, for all I know). The use of
ASCII in the mechanical RTTY days was a minority.
paul
On Jan 10, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
Hm, I got my first license in 1972, and five-level Baudot was still the
standard then, ISTR. Most folks were using things like Model 28s.
-- Ian King K7PDP On 01/10/2014 12:39 PM, Bruce Damer wrote:
Murray (?Baudot?) code is the classic, but ASCII has also been used since
the 1960s or so.
paul, ni1d
> I am rebuilding the RTTY station I had as a
teenager and I am trying
> to get my hands on an ASR-33 Teletype. Even though they built some
> 600,000+ machines, I am finding it quite difficult to track one down.
> I am looking for a machine with EXCELLENT cosmetics - it does not need
> to work - that can be fixed. For a machine in excellent condition, I
> would be willing to pay a king's ransom. So...if you know anyone who
> might have a machine that is in need of being utilized, please let me
> know, it would be greatly appreicated. --dave
I thought that RTTY used Murray code (e.g. ASR-32) not ASCII.
Or am I horribly out of date?
?Chuck 
7:15 p.m.
At 07:07 PM 1/11/2014, Paul Koning wrote:
That sounds right. As far as I know (from reading; I
wasn't active in
this area) ham radio RTTY was always mostly 5-level code (still may
be, for all I know). The use of ASCII in the mechanical RTTY days was
a minority.
Classic RTTY is still basically 5-level Murray ("Baudot") code with
simple frequency shift keying. There's still a fair amount of that,
mostly showing up in various contests. Almost nobody uses ASCII for
simple FSK teletype in ham stuff. I'd say it's pretty much nonexistent,
even though it's allowed by regulations.
There's a large (probably quite a bit larger than RTTY) block of
activity using ASCII in various phase shift or multi-tone modulation
techniques that allow reliable communications over marginal RF
transports. Some of these are quite interesting, such as very short
duration atmospheric ionization due to meteors. Oh, and using airplanes
and the moon as reflectors.
73,
-Rick (K1MU)
12 Jan
12 Jan
5:13 a.m.
On 01/11/2014 10:15 PM, Rick Murphy wrote:
At 07:07 PM 1/11/2014, Paul Koning wrote:
Old style RTTY is around but be careful since most people do it using
computers now the baud rate and
encoding me be incompatable with old TTY based RTTY. That and there
are several RTTY sounding modes
that are NOT RTTY.
That sounds right. As far as I know (from
reading; I wasn't active
in this area) ham radio RTTY was always mostly 5-level code (still
may be, for all I know). The use of ASCII in the mechanical RTTY
days was a minority.
Classic RTTY is still basically 5-level Murray ("Baudot") code with
simple frequency shift keying. There's still a fair amount of that,
mostly showing up in various contests. Almost nobody uses ASCII for
simple FSK teletype in ham stuff. I'd say it's pretty much
nonexistent, even though it's allowed by regulations.
There's a large (probably quite a bit larger than
RTTY) block of
activity using ASCII in various phase shift or multi-tone modulation
techniques that allow reliable communications over marginal RF
transports. Some of these are quite interesting, such as very short
duration atmospheric ionization due to meteors. Oh, and using
airplanes and the moon as reflectors.
Sounds like your talking about PSK31(HF
narrow band sound card digital
mode), WSJT65(weak signal and EME),
FSK441 (Meteor scatter). There are about 20 more modes and rates of
signaling currently in use those were the top three.
Some of those do not directly transmit ASCII, WSJT65 is a good example,
So would HellSchribe.
Allison/KB1GMX
5:04 a.m.
On 01/11/2014 07:07 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
On Jan 11, 2014, at 5:35 PM, Ian King <IanK at
LivingComputerMuseum.org> wrote:
And the baud rate was not 110, 75 sticks in my head.
Allison
On 1/10/14 2:36 PM, "Paul Koning"
<paulkoning at comcast.net> wrote:
That sounds right. As far as I know (from reading; I wasn?t
active in this area) ham radio RTTY was always mostly 5-level code (still may be, for all
I know). The use of ASCII in the mechanical RTTY days was a minority.
paul
On Jan 10, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Chuck Guzis
<cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
Hm, I got my first license in 1972, and five-level Baudot was still the
standard then, ISTR. Most folks were using things like Model 28s.
-- Ian King K7PDP On 01/10/2014 12:39 PM, Bruce Damer wrote:
>> I am rebuilding the RTTY station I had as a teenager and I am trying
>> to get my hands on an ASR-33 Teletype. Even though they built some
>> 600,000+ machines, I am finding it quite difficult to track one down.
>> I am looking for a machine with EXCELLENT cosmetics - it does not need
>> to work - that can be fixed. For a machine in excellent condition, I
>> would be willing to pay a king's ransom. So...if you know anyone who
>> might have a machine that is in need of being utilized, please let me
>> know, it would be greatly appreicated. --dave
I thought that RTTY used Murray code (e.g. ASR-32) not ASCII.
Or am I horribly out of date?
?Chuck
Murray (?Baudot?) code is the classic, but ASCII has also been used since
the 1960s or so.
paul, ni1d
10:58 a.m.
Hm, I got my first license in 1972, and five-level
Baudot was still the
standard then, ISTR. Most folks were using things like Model 28s.
I have an idea that at one time radio amateurs in the UK could only use
ITA2 (aka Murray, Baudot, although strictly it's not the same) by the
terms of the license. Nowadays 'Data' trasnmissions using ITA5 (ASCII)
are not uncommon, I think the only restriction now is that it can't be a
'secret code or cipher', which ASCII clearly isn't.
-tony
11 Jan
11 Jan
4:14 p.m.
On Jan 10, 2014, at 12:39 , Bruce Damer <bdamer at digitalspace.com> wrote:
From the Digibarn site, feel free to answer...
> Your Name: Dave Tumey
> Your Email address: davetumey at yahoo.com
[...]
> -----------
> I am rebuilding the RTTY station I had as a teenager and I am trying to get my hands
on an ASR-33 Teletype. Even though they built some 600,000+ machines, I am finding it
quite difficult to track one down. I am looking for a machine with EXCELLENT cosmetics -
it does not need to work - that can be fixed. For a machine in excellent condition, I
would be willing to pay a king's ransom. So...if you know anyone who might have a
machine that is in need of being utilized, please let me know, it would be greatly
appreicated. --dave
I also saw his posting on VCF. If he was just a little bit faster, like on the order of a
week or two, he could have snagged the ASR-33 I just bought on eBay. He mentioned on VCF
that he'd be willing to spend $1k-$2k on the right machine, and $1k happens to be what
that machine cost. I just received the final piece today; the seller broke it up into
three boxes for shipment, and built a crate around the main unit... part of the reason
that I was willing to bleed so heavily for this machine. And to think that I used to have
not one, but two ASR-33 units (one with a stand, one without), that I got for free and
gave away for free. Well, the new one has a chad box and the ones I used to have did not,
so maybe it'll hurt less if I think of it as a free Teletype and a $1k chad box?
Of course, if Mr. Tumey would like to offer me $2k for it, I will consider parting with
it! :)
Anyway, I will now take this opportunity to threadjack:
* The tape punch cover on my machine (the hinged piece with four clear buttons) has
broken/missing hinge tabs. I'll probably be able to fabricate some sort of repair
pieces, but I'd be interested in a good, clean, intact punch cover if one's
available.
* I'm having trouble finding 1" wide paper tape for my machine. It came with a
small bit of black paper tape, and I see a single expensive roll of dark-colored 1"
tape on eBay. I'd like to get a few rolls of plain old oiled paper tape in 1"
width with a 2" core. There are several listings for narrower tape on eBay, but
I'm not seeing the 1" width that I need. I'm looking forward to filling that
chad box...
* Last, but not least, I will naturally need a suitable computer such as a PDP-8 to go
with it! :)
I also have an incomplete ASR-33 that I got from the Guy Sotomayor extravaganza not long
ago. Once I figure out if I need any pieces of it for my new machine, I'll most likely
offer whatever is left as free-for-local-pickup. It's missing the tape punch cover
that I'm looking for, but there may be other bits of it that I'll need. Its
condition is right on the boundary where it could be considered a fixer-upper by somebody
modestly ambitious, but one wouldn't feel terribly guilty about stealing parts from
it, either.
--
Mark J. Blair, NF6X <nf6x at nf6x.net>
http://www.nf6x.net/
12 Jan
12 Jan
8:46 a.m.
Try: http://www.westnc.com/paper-tape-rolls.html
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Mark J. Blair <nf6x at nf6x.net> wrote:
...
* I'm having trouble finding 1" wide paper tape for my machine. It came
with a small bit of black paper tape, and I see a single expensive roll of
dark-colored 1" tape on eBay. I'd like to get a few rolls of plain old
oiled paper tape in 1" width with a 2" core. There are several listings for
narrower tape on eBay, but I'm not seeing the 1" width that I need. I'm
looking forward to filling that chad box...
--
Mark J. Blair, NF6X <nf6x at nf6x.net>
http://www.nf6x.net/
3999
days inactive
4001
days old
10 comments
9 participants
participants (9)
-
ajp166＠verizon.net -
ard＠p850ug1.demon.co.uk -
bdamer＠digitalspace.com -
cclist＠sydex.com -
IanK＠LivingComputerMuseum.org -
nf6x＠nf6x.net -
paulkoning＠comcast.net -
pbirkel＠gmail.com -
rick＠rickmurphy.net