5 Jun
2002
5 Jun
'02
2:50 p.m.
None. We either had a two-board Unibus set that
provided an
intellegent DDCMP connection (forget the model number, but *boy*
were they expensive when they first came out)
Might that have been the DMV11? I had one
hanging off the UNIBUS of the VAX 8350 for a
while. Luckily noone ever logged a bug so I
never had to fidn out whether it worked or not :-)
had one anyway), but it was hard on the CPU. We did
have some
old Qbus sync ports (DPV11?), but we never attached a MicroVAX
The older one was indeed the DPV11. The newer, spiffier and
more expensive one was the DSV11.
Antonio
5 Jun
5 Jun
3:47 p.m.
--- Antonio Carlini <Antonio.Carlini(a)riverstonenet.com> wrote:
Sounds close. Maybe a DMR11 for Unibus? (We didn't have one for
Qbus)
Never saw a DSV11 - too new and too spiffy. We used to ship
the DPV11 in the HASPBOX, the PDP-11-based predecessor to
the COMBOARD (the code, in fact, was 90% ported from PDP-11
MACRO to MC68000 assembler by a TECO macro. The comments in
some of the COMBOARD-I code still make reference to the PDP-11).
-ethan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
None. We
either had a two-board Unibus set that provided an
intellegent DDCMP connection...
Might that have been the DMV11? I had one hanging off the UNIBUS of the VAX 8350 for a
while. Luckily noone ever logged a bug so I
never had to fidn out whether it worked or not :-)
Why do bugs matter?
had one
anyway), but it was hard on the CPU. We did have some
old Qbus sync ports (DPV11?), but we never attached a MicroVAX
The older one was indeed the DPV11. The newer, spiffier and
more expensive one was the DSV11.
8254
days inactive
8254
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Antonio.Carlini＠riverstonenet.com -
erd_6502＠yahoo.com