I think people are kind-of forgetting something in this discussion: "value" is
set by the people that are buying, and for every collectable there are probably different
rules.
We can look to the classic car collectors for guidance here. With some cars (say, like
the Model T) there are still tons of old-stock parts out there, so for a Model T to have
extraordinary value requires that it has all OEM parts. Contrast that to a Tucker, where
even the OEM used weird parts on some cars given the prototype nature.. however,
documentation is always key.
An excellent contra-example is in cameras. You could have a pristeen in-the-box Polaroid
camera and a barely working similar vintage TLR.. guess what's worth more? It
isn't the Polaroid. The TLR likely still is a functional camera (film is available).
Polaroid film by in large is not available.
It is sensible to me that limited modification to maintain an operational state
wouldn't affect the collectible value much, especially compared to "not working
at all."
Show replies by date
What is worth more, an Apple I motherboard with all original chips but maybe
non functional, and an Apple I motherboard that has been reworked to
function with later date coded chips and other parts. I would bet it is the
all original unit, and few if any collectors would even try to turn it on
anyway.
----- Original Message -----
From: "A. C. Baumann" <feedle at feedle.net>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: retr0brite not so right?
It is sensible to me that limited modification to maintain an operational
state wouldn't affect the collectible value much, especially compared to
"not working at all."