15 Aug
2005
15 Aug
'05
11:31 p.m.
Bj?rn Vermo <bv at norbionics.com> wrote:
The equivalent photodetector to match high-resolution
film will then be
9600x14400, giving us 138240000 or for short 138 megapixels.
are these real
megapixels or the bogo-pixels used by digital camera
manufacturers; they count each colour separately so that a 3megapixel
camera actually has 1 megapixel of blue, 1 megapixel or red and
1 megapixel of green sensor elements. They output 3 megapixel
files by extrapolation.
16 Aug
16 Aug
12:55 p.m.
Didn't this thread die about a week ago?
In the future, can these messages simply be gated out of existence during
the moderation process (i.e. treated as spam?)
I'll volunteer for the gating if I could do this. I'm sure nobody would
like me as a moderator, so the better option is for people to not be so
blatantly about off-topic. This is just rude and annoying.
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Vassilis Prevelakis wrote:
Bj?rn Vermo <bv at norbionics.com> wrote:
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
The equivalent photodetector to match
high-resolution film will then be
9600x14400, giving us 138240000 or for short 138 megapixels.
are these real
megapixels or the bogo-pixels used by digital camera
manufacturers; they count each colour separately so that a 3megapixel
camera actually has 1 megapixel of blue, 1 megapixel or red and
1 megapixel of green sensor elements. They output 3 megapixel
files by extrapolation.
6910
days inactive
6910
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
vcf＠siconic.com -
vp＠cs.drexel.edu