Sorry for contributing to the spam level, but you have to break an egg,
etc. I promise that if anybody replies, I won't reply to the classiccmp
list.
There are hundreds of people on this list; most post infrequently, if at
all. It seems that 5% of the list have a hair trigger that demands that
they respond to every message. That would be fine, but it seems like at
least 50% of such messages are WAY OFF TOPIC. Yes, I'm shouting, and
yes I'm making up numbers.
All of these hundreds of people are very smart and know many things.
Most of the sense to exercise some self control and not jump in at every
opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge, or worse, their unsupported
opinions.
The ONLY thing that gives cctalk value is that it has a charter. There
are untold avenues on the internet if you want to have free ranging
discourse.
Before you hit send on your next message to cctalk, ask yourself these
intertwined questions:
(1) Why am I not sending this as a private reply?
Is it just your ego wanting to be seen as a
smart person that needs a large audience? If
John Public says cheese tastes bad, send John
Public a private message if you want to tell
him he is wrong; the rest of us don't need to
know about it.
(2) What new information is this message offering?
Is it worth the time of 600 people (or whatever)
even if all they need to do his scan the subject
line and hit delete? This isn't IRC, so hopefully
posts will be more thoughtful than that.
(3) Is this message still about classic computers?
Yes, the guy you are responding to might have
thought it was OK, but that doesn't mean it was.
Fight the drift. If you must reply, see #1.
(4) If you still can't help yourself, do the next best
thing, a practice that has seems to have disappeared.
Reply with your marginal response, then add some
on-topic tidbit to at least give a little nourishment
to the list. "Obligatory classiccmp content: blah blah"
for example.
(5) Even if you ignore #1-#4, recognize subject drift and
change the subject line. The "scanning formats" thread,
which started on-topic, is now an umbrella for six
different (mostly off-topic) threads.
Yup, some of those off-topic threads had interesting content, but this
is not the forum for it. If you want to argue it, then imagine if
everyone who was into photography wanted to talk about interesting
techniques, or everyone interested in politics wanted to talk about
interesting power plays and developments, etc, etc.
Show replies by date
Jim Battle wrote:
Sorry for contributing to the spam level, but you have
to break an egg,
etc. I promise that if anybody replies, I won't reply to the classiccmp
list.
Sounds like you need to be on cctech, not cctalk.
Jules wrote....
Sounds like you need to be on cctech, not cctalk.
Not really, since I've posted several times that cctech will be combined
along with cctalk. The split was a good idea on paper, but not in practice.
I've been trying to find the time to merge the lists back in to one for some
time now. But regardless of when MY time allows, I've made it clear the
lists are being rejoined and people will just have to stick more closely to
on-topicness. It's a common courtesy thing... meeting in the middle. And
it's the only way things are going to work.
J
Jim Battle wrote....
Sorry for contributing to the spam level, but you have
to break an egg,
etc. I promise that if anybody replies, I won't reply to the classiccmp
list.
....snippage of stuff that shouldn't be snipped....
Right on Jim. Your sentiment is echoed by me.
Jay