On 5/28/2006 at 5:44 AM Nico de Jong wrote:
The worst one I remember, is the BackPack QIC-80 drive
from
MicroSolutions.
Our Tax authorities wanted to invest in these drives,
because the were so
cheap, and many used them. I told them outright, that my experience with
those drives had been bad, and that wouldnt sell them to anyone, so if
they
wanted them desperately, they would have to go
somewhere else.
Our tax folks invested at various times in Bernouilli drives (150 aand 250
MB), DDS, 8mm and DLT and MO (4.6 GB Apex drives) and then just went to
large hard drives for backup. They actually bought about 150 of the
Pereos units and never used them AFAIK. Maybe they've already shown up on
DoveBid. Didn't HP at some point, offer a Travan solution that featured
read-after write?
I got the rah-rah routine from a very high corporate officer of Datasonix
(he's still around, so I won't name-drop) that they'd solved all of the
problems with tape and then some. The tapes were all of 2.5 mm in width
and were helically-scanned, just like videotape--the transport was made by
Sony.. When I asked if tape stretching wasn't going to be a problem, he
made an allusion to embedded servo techniques. But no read-after-write, so
you got to discover the bad news only if you went back and verified your
backup.
Actually, given the whole "floppy-tape" scene, I'm amazed that more folks
didn't set their PeeCees on fire and throw them out of a third-story
window. It would take you somewhere around 5-6 hours to back up a 1 GB
drive with the Pereos--and that assumed a good tape, which was rare.
As far as I know, Sony itself never deployed the technology on so much as
an audio note-taking system.
And folks are still not backing things up. Our local hospital here
recently lost about 5000 images on their GE Xray machine. It's served by a
RAID arrary, but that doesn't protect from software gone bad. So they were
contacting folks to come back in and get new pictures taken.
Cheers,
Chuck