Jules Richardson wrote:
Well if the IBM PC hadn't turned up, surely computers would have ended up in
the hands of the masses anyway? There were plenty of good, robust, expandable
systems with good software support worldwide at the time - all it needed was
for society to be ready to accept 'the computer' on a wider scale. IBM just
happened to be in the right place at the right time, and it's unfortunate that
they'd built a turkey :-)
I agree. Whether it was Apple or IBM or Tandy or someone else, it would
have happened anyway. If I had my 'druthers though, what ended up in
the hands of the masses would have been more of a real appliance than
something to be viewed as a computer. When you get right down to it
the main differences among a game console, a dedicated word processor
and a "personal computer" are the expectations of the user. Nothing
wrong with giving the masses a toaster that can transform into a mixer.
But when you foist on them a device that they need a class at the local
community college to learn "how to use" then you've done a disservice
to both the masses and to the computer scientists.
To bring this back to the collectibility question, there have been a few
machines that seemed to be pitched in that direction. But they never
seemed to generate the momentum that "we've got these at work; I'll
buy one for home" did. A collection of those would make a nice niche
display in a computing museum.
BLS