I seriously doubt that the sync signals have any effect at all on the "stereo" vision effect you may observe when playing some games, etc. In fact, at the risk of saying "bah, humbug" about what's obviously a popular feature, the monitor, as far as I can see, can do little to help what's being displayed on it. Of course, being bright, sharp, well converged and linearized, is always better than not. Using a fixed ffrequency monitor on a PC is always a pain in the *ss. No matter how diligently the vendor of these cards calining to make it work have pursued the features, there's always some sort of problem, be it the mouse, the floppy disk, something is going to screw up. I'd advise anyone contemplating this sort of monitor to get an a/b switch as sold by MEI and countless others and use the BIG monitor for WIndows or whatever they want, and use a $10 vga from the thrift store for everything else. That should do the trick with minimal pain. That way they must have a video card capable of supporting their monitor, but don't have to have a custom BIOS rom on it to support the BIG monitor. IF the card you are considering will support the non-interlaced 1280 by 1024 at the vertical rate, or close to it, for which the monitor was designed, you should consider yourself lucky. These won't be cheap, because the video DAC has to be very fast, (run the numbers!) to cough up pixels in 64k colors at 1.12x the product of the horizontal rate and the number of pixels. That $160 card which was mentioned yesterday on this thread was capable, but $160 is not an ordinary price! Dick -----Original Message----- From: Carlos Murillo <cem14(a)cornell.edu> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu> Date: Friday, December 10, 1999 9:09 PM Subject: Re: Hewlett Packard A2094 Monitor (Standard RGB ?)