On Monday 19 January 2009 05:05:33 pm jeff.kaneko at 
juno.com wrote:
  -- "Roy J. Tellason" <rtellason at
verizon.net> wrote:
   Alas my
expeerience suggests the reverse. Back when computers were
 expensive, and chips were expensive, the manufacutrers took the
 >trouble to put all sorts of protectinon in
their machines to protect 
 said expensive decices in the event of a failure. Now
they don't bother. 
I would suspect that a younger crop of engineers coming up might have
 >some bearing on this too.  :-) 
 
 Actually, I would be more likely to suspect the current crop of
 engineering *managers* as a more likely cause (both pointy-haired
 and not).  "My gawd, boy, those extra bits add $0.10 to our build
 cost! Do we really need that for the product to meet spec?" 
You're probably right.  The Earl Muntz approach carried to exremes...
--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space,  a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed.  --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
M Dakin