On Monday 19 January 2009 05:05:33 pm jeff.kaneko at
juno.com wrote:
-- "Roy J. Tellason" <rtellason at
verizon.net> wrote:
Alas my
expeerience suggests the reverse. Back when computers were
expensive, and chips were expensive, the manufacutrers took the
>trouble to put all sorts of protectinon in
their machines to protect
said expensive decices in the event of a failure. Now
they don't bother.
I would suspect that a younger crop of engineers coming up might have
>some bearing on this too. :-)
Actually, I would be more likely to suspect the current crop of
engineering *managers* as a more likely cause (both pointy-haired
and not). "My gawd, boy, those extra bits add $0.10 to our build
cost! Do we really need that for the product to meet spec?"
You're probably right. The Earl Muntz approach carried to exremes...
--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space, a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed. --Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
M Dakin