On Dec 23, 1:22, Pete Turnbull wrote:
On Dec 22, 23:15, Tony Duell wrote:
As the fault wasn't on the M8650, why did
they cut that track? Did they
just never want interrupts?
I've no idea. It wasn't cut by the previous owner; he doesn't know why
either.
I've just realised something. The machine was used in a real-time process
control system in the pharmaceutical industry. If that system was designed
as a "hard" real-time system, then interrupts would be verboten, as then it
would be impossible to calculate the worst-case execution times for
scheduling routines. I guess this was built not very long after the
Flixborough disaster in 1974 -- an event still used as an example in
safety-critical systems design courses. My guess is the designers just
eliminated all the unlikely problems they could, as well as the likely
ones.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York