Subject: Re: FPGA VAX update
From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:13:45 -0800
To: cctalk at
classiccmp.org
On 11/2/2005 at 6:31 PM Allison wrote:
Valves are harder due to power, heat and most
importantly size. A few
hundred
miniature duo-triodes will fill several racks.
I used to buy old mil-surplus boards that each contained six wired-in
subminiature (Raytheon CK something or the other) dual triodes--no sockets,
the tubes were equipped with wire lead bases and were about the size of
those suminiature tubes in the old Motorola Pixie radio. At the time, I
wasn't that interested in computers, but the triodes made for some great
VHF circuits.
Ah 5899 5636 and 6111 come to mind. I have a bunch and have build radios
around them.
What surprises me about the home-built computers from
scratch is the lack
of imagination when it comes to architecture. Most are basically
one-address-cum-accumulator designs. It would seem that larger register
files are much easier to build nowadays and would open up the door to some
2 and 3-address designs.
That would be an area where performance can be found with even simple
instruction sets.
I've always thought that 24 bits is a nice word
size for a small computer.
Divisible by 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12 bits. An instruction could use 6 bits
for opcode and 3 register addresses out of a 64 register file...
Variable word length, dataflow, all sorts of possibilities--why be limited
by implementing something that resembles an already existing machine?
one word... SOFTWARE.
But then why go to the trouble of wiring the thing up?
Write a
simulator--it'll probably run faster anyway.
A friend suggested that sims are just software on a bloated wintel box.
Eh, nice for creating software for the iron. Me, I'd rather fight with the
iron and have something that has heft and is real.
Allison