4 Jul
1999
4 Jul
'99
10:28 p.m.
<I agree. I use PINE, and I've always used PINE. I used Nutscrap mail for
I use pine via Telnet from work... slow but works.
The home system runs RDFmail and that uses a no slip or ppp interface so
going from mail to Nyetscrap is a whole change of enviroment in W3.1.
A brief one liner so we know if it's worth the effort is not much to ask.
<Oh, and I use flwm now... (based on wm2) not totally perfect, but small
<and fast, plus I have the source and am working on my own version of it..
I'm trying out Caldara2.2 with KDE, interesting compared to slackware 3!
Allison
5 Jul
5 Jul
9:12 p.m.
New subject: OT: Mailreader setups/Re: E-Bay URLs rant
My quick .02,
I use pine via SSH on my box at work, since it's been the only way I can
keep mail messages organized and available on the work, home, and laptop
machines. Pine users shouldn't complain too much, since you can set it up
to launch a web browser for inline URL's in mail messages. I have mine
launch lynx by default, but the nice thing about SSH is that you can
forward secure X connections and even a biggie like the KDE web browser
runs surprisingly well over DSL...
But I agree, a one-line description would be polite.
Aaron
On Sun, 4 Jul 1999, Allison J Parent wrote:
<I agree. I use PINE, and I've always used
PINE. I used Nutscrap mail for
I use pine via Telnet from work... slow but works.
The home system runs RDFmail and that uses a no slip or ppp interface so
going from mail to Nyetscrap is a whole change of enviroment in W3.1.
A brief one liner so we know if it's worth the effort is not much to ask.
9309
days inactive
9310
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
af-list＠lafleur.wfi-inc.com -
allisonp＠world.std.com