--- Jules Richardson <julesrichardsonuk at yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
Don wrote:
Stan Barr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jules Richardson said:
>
>> Given that the licence is only for the BBC
channels, and I'll perhaps
>> watch 2-3 hours of them per week, it
works out
as quite an expense
>> per programme!
>
> Not quite - the licence is for having _any_
equipment installed in your
> home capable of receiving broadcast tv -
_any_
broadcast tv. The money
> goes (mostly) to the bbc, but a licence is
required for any broadcast
>> tv equipment including, but not limited to, a t
v
set, video or dvd
>> recorder with a tuner or a computer with a tune
r.
You still have to
>> pay even if you never watch the bbc :-(
> So, the *tuner* is the gotcha? I.e. if
you used
a
component
DVD player/recorder, a video *monitor*, etc.
*they* would be
exempt?
Actually, the way I always understood it is that t
he
licence fee funds the BBC
and isn't used for anything else (such and funding
general transmitter
install/upkeep). But the Government call it a "TV
licence" even though all the
cash goes to the BBC, and therefore you need to pa
y
for the licence if you
want to watch any channels, not just the BBC.
I don't know how well it's been challenged in cour
t
- but as the BBC transmits
on slightly different frequencies across the count
ry
it'd be hard to market a
device that was guaranteed not to be able to recei
ve
the BBC now or in the
future, whilst being able to receive anything else
.
Thats the way I think it works too. I believe
the BBC had to renew the patent (or whatever)
a few years ago, so we'll be paying them for
another 50 years or so.
For those outside the US, the BBC also runs
atleast 5 main radio stations , plus local ones,
here in the UK.
Also, some handheld games devices such as
my Sega Gamegear (and I believe Nintendo's
Game Boy Advance) have TV Tuners which allow
them to receive terrestrial TV.
Not quite sure how good the picture quality is
as I don't have a PSU for my Gamegear yet! :(
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk