Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 16:06:29 -0700
From: Richard <legalize at xmission.com>
In article <45916C11.95F67729 at rain.org>,
Marvin Johnston <marvin at rain.org> writes:
[...] My guess (now)
is that computermkt has a pretty good handle on what an item *can*
bring, and
prices his stuff accordingly. [...]
I don't see how an Atari 800 is going to bring $300 when they sell
routinely on ebay for $30. (or whatever, insert actual price here.)
He knows this because he'll *buy* the item from ebay for $30 and then
turn it around and list it at $300.
It looks like the majority of his stuff expires unsold and the stuff
that is selling is best offer below his ask.
He must have really cheap storage space, a ready supply of old boxes
and lots of free time on his hands for this model to work effectivley.
This is a bit off-topic for the thread, but deals with the same
philosophy of selling question.
Sager had 128 pin 13 X 13 PGA sockets for $3 each a few years ago.
They have over 2500 of them in stock. I didn't buy any because I
was not about to start the project I have in mind for them. Now
they are priced at over $17 each. They still have over 2500 of them
in stock. As far as I can tell, they aren't selling any of them,
but they have upped the price by almost a factor of 6.
How does this business practice make sense? Can they take a larger
tax write-off when/if they dispose of them, if they list them at a
high price for a while? Surely any tax benefit is based on their
cost? Do they think a large corporate customer or the military will
suddenly find a desperate need for 68030 sockets?
The 128 pin socket fits the 68030 processor. I'm minded to
re-design the Daystar adapter for the Macintosh IIcx to physically
fit in the SE/30. But I would need a hundred or two of the PGA
sockets to make it a viable project. At $3 each it was doable. At
$17 each the cost of sockets would be more than what most folks would
want to pay (I think) for the finished product.
Jeff Walther