19 Aug
2016
19 Aug
'16
11:08 a.m.
Back in the day, did anyone produce an X11 server for DOS-based 8086/8088 systems, say
with support for Hercules or CGA graphics? Or was that strictly a 286-or-better thing,
given the overall constraints of the 8086 architecture?
(There were plenty of mouse-and-window systems for the PC/XT back then, I expect black
& white X11 over a serial link would not be *that* bad?)
-- Chris
19 Aug
19 Aug
11:23 a.m.
(There were plenty of mouse-and-window systems for the
PC/XT back then, I ex$
If the serial link runs at a relatively high data rate (eg, 115200) or
LBX support is in use and the data rate is at least medium (eg, 19200),
probably.
If not...well, it depends on how patient you are, I suppose, but _I_
wouldn't want to have to use it.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
2:40 p.m.
On Aug 19, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Chris Hanson
<cmhanson at eschatologist.net> wrote:
Back in the day, did anyone produce an X11 server for DOS-based 8086/8088 systems, say
with support for Hercules or CGA graphics? Or was that strictly a 286-or-better thing,
given the overall constraints of the 8086 architecture?
(There were plenty of mouse-and-window systems for the PC/XT back then, I expect black
& white X11 over a serial link would not be *that* bad?)
-- Chris
The only thing that comes to mind is DESQview/X, and IIRC, that required a minimum of a
386.
I tend to think that X11 over serial would be nothing short of nightmarish. After all,
that?s why we have VNC.
Zane
2:54 p.m.
On Aug 19, 2016, at 2:40 PM, Zane Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
There was plenty more than DESQview/X, and there were X11 servers that ran on 286.
On Aug 19, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Chris Hanson
<cmhanson at eschatologist.net> wrote:
Back in the day, did anyone produce an X11 server for DOS-based 8086/8088 systems, say
with support for Hercules or CGA graphics? Or was that strictly a 286-or-better thing,
given the overall constraints of the 8086 architecture?
(There were plenty of mouse-and-window systems for the PC/XT back then, I expect black
& white X11 over a serial link would not be *that* bad?)
-- Chris
The only thing that comes to mind is DESQview/X, and IIRC, that required a minimum of a
386. I tend to think that X11 over serial would be nothing
short of nightmarish. After all, that?s why we have VNC.
I'm very specifically talking about pure black & white, with server-side
bitmap-only fonts, and also (though I didn't originally say so) with an X client
itself written in the 1980s that only really bare-bones X11R3 or so and only uses black
& white. And running on a workstation of that era, of course.
While I wouldn't want to use such a combination over, say, 1200bps dialup, it
doesn't seem like it would be utterly awful via a direct connection at whatever the
serial port on a PC with an NEC V20 (8086-compatible and around 8 MHz) could handle
reliably.
-- Chris
3:22 p.m.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Chris Hanson
<cmhanson at eschatologist.net> wrote:
There was PC DECwindows which ran on a 286 system on top of a Rational
Systems DOS extender, and on a 386 or better system on top of a Phar
Lap DOS extender. Those were based on ports of X11R2 - X11R4 source in
the 1988-1989 time frame. By then there was no thought of trying to
fit any sort of implementation in a real mode 8088 system.
(Working on PC DECwindows was my first real job out of college)
The only thing that comes to mind is DESQview/X, and IIRC, that required a minimum of a
386.
There was plenty more than DESQview/X, and there were X11 servers that ran on 286.
3:32 p.m.
While I wouldn't want to use such a combination
over, say, 1200bps dialup, i$
I decided to try this.
I just set up a SLIP link between my main desktop head (a
SPARCstation-20) and a handy peecee, running at 9600/8/N/1 on each end.
I then sshed through the SLIP link to the peecee and started a terminal
emulator, displaying on the ssh-forwarded X display. (My own terminal
emulator, running with just base X fonts - in particular, with
server-side font rendering.)
It's no speed demon, but it is entirely usable. I've had less usable
ssh sessions between cities when the inter-city links were heavily
loaded.
This is without even LBX, which I would expect would improve
performance substantially but which has proven resistant to use. (I've
been unable to get anything but connection rejections out of it; I
don't know why, but don't want to hare off on chasing after that with
an email pending.)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
6:21 p.m.
similar story, many lifetimes ago in the mid 1990's (1994-1996).
I was supporting a small ISP in a (US side) border town with T1 Internet
connectivity. I was dialing in to provide remote support using an HP Vectra
running Solaris 2.5 (not 2.5.1 yet :( ) with a US Robotics 28.8 modem. No SSH.
I never attempted a full desktop, but several times I recall running X11 based
apps, exporting the Display to my local x86 Solaris PC.
It was always slow, but once loaded and running, it was enough to get the task I
needed complete.
None of that would ever fly today. or even a decade ago.
Jerry
On 08/19/16 05:32 PM, Mouse wrote:
While I
wouldn't want to use such a combination over, say, 1200bps dialup, i$
I decided to try this.
I just set up a SLIP link between my main desktop head (a
SPARCstation-20) and a handy peecee, running at 9600/8/N/1 on each end.
I then sshed through the SLIP link to the peecee and started a terminal
emulator, displaying on the ssh-forwarded X display. (My own terminal
emulator, running with just base X fonts - in particular, with
server-side font rendering.)
It's no speed demon, but it is entirely usable. I've had less usable
ssh sessions between cities when the inter-city links were heavily
loaded.
This is without even LBX, which I would expect would improve
performance substantially but which has proven resistant to use. (I've
been unable to get anything but connection rejections out of it; I
don't know why, but don't want to hare off on chasing after that with
an email pending.)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
4:56 p.m.
On 08/19/2016 11:08, Chris Hanson wrote:
Back in the day, did anyone produce an X11 server for DOS-based
8086/8088 systems, say with support for Hercules or CGA graphics?
Or was that strictly a 286-or-better thing, given the overall
constraints of the 8086 architecture?
I realize this pretty divergent from your question, but... ISTR there
was a barebones X terminal that used the 8086, but I can't find it via
Google. I got to prod at one on some occasion, it was pretty much a joke.
Don't recall what might have been under the covers handling the video,
but the theme was low-spec. Contrast to the HP 700/X terminals used a
combination of 34010 and 80186:
Models Display Resolution Planes Processor Coprocessor
------ ------- ---------- ------ --------- -----------
700/X Grayscale 19" 1024x768 8 34010/60MHz 80186/16MHz
700/X VGA Color 14" 640x480 8 34010/60MHz 80186/16MHz
700/X Hi-Res Color 16" 1024x768 8 34010/60MHz 80186/16MHz
( From SunFLASH Vol 26 #9, Feb 1991 )
--S.
9:38 p.m.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Steven M Jones <classiccmp at crash.com> wrote:
Models Display Resolution Planes
Processor Coprocessor
------ ------- ---------- ------ --------- -----------
700/X Grayscale 19" 1024x768 8 34010/60MHz 80186/16MHz
700/X VGA Color 14" 640x480 8 34010/60MHz 80186/16MHz
700/X Hi-Res Color 16" 1024x768 8 34010/60MHz 80186/16MHz
Before anyone gets too excited about the blistering speed of the 60
MHz TMS34010, it should be noted that each TMS34010 instruction cycle
takes eight clock cycles, so the instruction cycle rate is only 7.5
MHz, and of course many instructions take multiple instruction cycles,
so the instruction rate is even lower. However, since it has a
graphics-optimized instruction set, it was still able to do some
things noticeably faster than the 16 MHz 80186 would have.
20 Aug
20 Aug
7:06 a.m.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Steven M Jones
<classiccmp at crash.com> wrote:
Somewhere I have a thing badged 'Princeton Ultra-X'. This is a pizza-box type
slab that goes under a VGA montor and links to a keyboard and mouse and is,
of course a standalone Xterminal.
It uses an 80188 for I/O (including 10Mbps ethernet). The Xserver is in EPROMs
and appears to run on the TMS34010 graphics processor.
-tony
Models Display Resolution Planes
Processor Coprocessor
------ ------- ---------- ------ --------- -----------
700/X Grayscale 19" 1024x768 8 34010/60MHz 80186/16MHz
700/X VGA Color 14" 640x480 8 34010/60MHz 80186/16MHz
700/X Hi-Res Color 16" 1024x768 8 34010/60MHz 80186/16MHz
Before anyone gets too excited about the blistering speed of the 60
MHz TMS34010, it should be noted that each TMS34010 instruction cycle
takes eight clock cycles, so the instruction cycle rate is only 7.5
MHz, and of course many instructions take multiple instruction cycles,
so the instruction rate is even lower. However, since it has a
graphics-optimized instruction set, it was still able to do some
things noticeably faster than the 16 MHz 80186 would have. 
10:20 a.m.
On 08/20/2016 09:06 AM, tony duell wrote:
Somewhere I have a thing badged 'Princeton
Ultra-X'. This is a pizza-box type
slab that goes under a VGA montor and links to a keyboard and mouse and is,
of course a standalone Xterminal.
It uses an 80188 for I/O (including 10Mbps ethernet). The Xserver is in EPROMs
and appears to run on the TMS34010 graphics processor.
I had a similar unit from NCD, which if I remember right had an m88k CPU as
its heart. That one was 8-bit color (at 1024x786, I think), so maybe a
little newer than yours. I have no idea what happened to it!
Back in the day I remember using monochrome NCD X terminals though, and
those things were just great - it would be nice to find one again one day.
I just did some searching and can't even find a photo of one online. The
displays were large, and I want to say the aspect ratio was either portrait
or maybe square, rather than any kind of modern landscape nonsense :-)
cheers
Jules
12:48 p.m.
[small
pizza-box X terminal]
I had a similar unit from NCD, [...] Back in the day I remember using monochrome NCD X
terminals though,
and those things were just great - it would be nice to find one again
one day.
I own two NCD X-terminals; if you can drop by Ottawa, I wouldn't mind
unloading one onto someone who'll appreciate it properly. :-)
I just did some searching and can't even find a
photo of one online.
I may be able to take a picture at some point.
The displays were large, and I want to say the aspect
ratio was
either portrait or maybe square, rather than any kind of modern
landscape nonsense :-)
IIRC the ones I have are 4:3 landscape, but they could be square; it's
been a while since I had much to do with them.
Mine are in storage, not amenable to easy checking at the moment, but
IIRC their NCD model number is 19r.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
21 Aug
21 Aug
1:26 p.m.
On 08/20/2016 02:48 PM, Mouse wrote:
You're actually south of me, despite my being in the US, but the trip out
west is a little bit of a stretch (at least, just for a terminal) - I think
it'd be around 900 miles. But thanks, though - I'll park that bit of info
in my brain though just in case I'm ever out in your neck of the woods
anyway; I can always contact you and see if you still have a spare one.
Yes, I think the 19r's are 4:3 - I remember those having quite nice styling
and very curved screens (actually, I wonder if they're the same physical
CRT inside as Sun used on some of their old workstation displays) so they
still look quite nice (and of course being monochrome the display quality
is very good)
cheers
Jules
[small pizza-box X terminal]
I had a similar
unit from NCD, [...] Back in the day I remember using monochrome NCD X
terminals though,
and those things were just great - it would be nice to find one again
one day.
I own two NCD X-terminals; if you can drop by Ottawa, I wouldn't mind
unloading one onto someone who'll appreciate it properly. :-) The displays
were large, and I want to say the aspect ratio was
either portrait or maybe square, rather than any kind of modern
landscape nonsense :-)
IIRC the ones I have are 4:3 landscape, but they could be square; it's
been a while since I had much to do with them.
Mine are in storage, not amenable to easy checking at the moment, but
IIRC their NCD model number is 19r.
2997
days inactive
2999
days old
12 comments
9 participants
participants (9)
-
ard＠p850ug1.demon.co.uk -
classiccmp＠crash.com -
cmhanson＠eschatologist.net -
glen.slick＠gmail.com -
healyzh＠aracnet.com -
jules.richardson99＠gmail.com -
mouse＠Rodents-Montreal.ORG -
other＠oryx.us -
spacewar＠gmail.com